Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of carmoisine A from wastewater using waste materials—Bottom ash and deoiled soya

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe present study deals with the application of bottom ash, a power plant waste, and deoiled soya, an agricultural waste, for the adsorptive removal of carmoisine A dye from its aqueous solutions. This paper incorporates a comparative study of the adsorption characteristics of the dye on these effective adsorbents along with effects of time, temperature, concentration, and pH. Analytical techniques have been employed to find pore properties and characteristics of adsorbent materials. Batch adsor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This deviation from the origin was due to the variation of mass transfer in the initial and final stages of adsorption process. This confirms that adsorption of MB on PC/TW was a multistep process involving adsorption on the external surface and diffusion into the interior (Kumar and Kumaran 2005;Gupta et al 2009Gupta et al , 2010Gupta et al , 2011a.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This deviation from the origin was due to the variation of mass transfer in the initial and final stages of adsorption process. This confirms that adsorption of MB on PC/TW was a multistep process involving adsorption on the external surface and diffusion into the interior (Kumar and Kumaran 2005;Gupta et al 2009Gupta et al , 2010Gupta et al , 2011a.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Increasing pH value from 2.0 to 8.4 was observed to diminish the adsorption capacity, whereas the successive increase in pH value up to 12 no longer had a significant effect on the adsorption capacity. Gupta et al (2009) and Baseri et al (2012) presented comparable results on dye removal by activated carbon adsorption. Similar findings were reported by Gupta et al (2011) on chromium removal that there was a limit (pH 5) at which the pH could be increased to get maximum removal efficiency.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Among them, we can include heavy metals, dyes, pesticides, rubber chemicals and diverse industrial wastes and different approaches have been devised in order to reduce them. These strategies include, for example, adsorption to remove heavy metals or dyes (Jain et al 2003;Gupta et al 2006Gupta et al , 2007aGupta et al , 2009Gupta et al , 2010Gupta et al , 2011Mittal et al 2008), photochemical degradation (Gupta et al 2007b), biosorption (Mittal et al 2010) and advanced oxidation process (AOP) (Karthikeyan et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%