2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03162-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption-based atmospheric water harvesting device for arid climates

Abstract: Water scarcity is a particularly severe challenge in arid and desert climates. While a substantial amount of water is present in the form of vapour in the atmosphere, harvesting this water by state-of-the-art dewing technology can be extremely energy intensive and impractical, particularly when the relative humidity (RH) is low (i.e., below ~40% RH). In contrast, atmospheric water generators that utilise sorbents enable capture of vapour at low RH conditions and can be driven by the abundant source of solar-th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
412
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
4
412
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 3a, PGF delivers the rapid moisture sorption with an equilibrium water uptake of 5.20 g g −1 at an RH of 100%, much higher than that of pure rGO and PAAS foam with the value of 0.26 and 1.29 g g −1 , respectively. Compared with previous reports (Table S1, Supporting Information), [13][14][15][16][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] PGF in this study shows an outstanding ability for moisture capture in the full range of humidity, which will largely broaden the applications in diverse environments. The microporous structure of PGF provides effective transport channels and an enlarged contact area for moisture, and oxygen functional groups of PAAS can spontaneously capture water molecules through hydrogen bonding ( Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201905875mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 3a, PGF delivers the rapid moisture sorption with an equilibrium water uptake of 5.20 g g −1 at an RH of 100%, much higher than that of pure rGO and PAAS foam with the value of 0.26 and 1.29 g g −1 , respectively. Compared with previous reports (Table S1, Supporting Information), [13][14][15][16][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] PGF in this study shows an outstanding ability for moisture capture in the full range of humidity, which will largely broaden the applications in diverse environments. The microporous structure of PGF provides effective transport channels and an enlarged contact area for moisture, and oxygen functional groups of PAAS can spontaneously capture water molecules through hydrogen bonding ( Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201905875mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…

contaminated inevitably by the impurities, such as microorganisms, fine particulate matters (PM), and toxic gases like sulfur oxides (SO x ). [13][14][15][16] However, MOF-801 only worked in a narrow RH range (<20% RH) with low water uptake, and the quality of the oozed water from PNI-PAAm/Alg hydrogel was uncertain for the risk of impurities. For instance, metalorganic frameworks (MOFs) like MOF-801 could harvest 0.25 g g −1 water at a relative humidity (RH) of 20%, and poly(Nisopropyl acrylamide)/sodium alginate (PNIPAAm/Alg) polymer hydrogel demonstrated 0.6 g g −1 water uptake at the RH of 80%, respectively.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15] As a result, the fundamental limits of this technique have not been properly clarified, making it hard to evaluate the performance of the experiments [13][14][20][21][22] and to determine whether or not this technology is applicable under various conditions, in particular in relatively arid areas. [5][6] In this paper, building upon the recent developments of the radiative cooling technology, 23-30 we develop a theoretical framework to analyze the dew-harvesting mass flux (̇′′) of a black and a selective emitter in a wide range of parameters including the ambient temperature (Tambient), the relative humidity (RH), and the convection coefficient (h). We point out that the selective emitter surpasses its black counterpart, in particular under high Tambient in relative arid areas, where the needs of the potable water are more demanding but impossible to be met using a black emitter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[202,203] In this device, the water adsorbent layer was fabricated by infiltrating MOF-801 powders into porous copper foam, while the solar absorber side was coated with graphite or pyromark painting to ensure the MOF-801 with high temperature (i.e., 80 °C) to desorb water from. In 2017, Yaghi and Wang and co-workers first demonstrated a porous MOF (MOF-801, [Zr 6 O 4 (OH) 4 (fumarate) 6 ]) exhibited superior ability to capture water from the atmosphere at low humidity levels (as low as 20%) by using low-grade heat from natural sunlight.…”
Section: Photothermal-assisted Water Harvesting From Airmentioning
confidence: 99%