2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00020-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are registered in the Table. 2 with the values of the loading capacity decreasing for each anion. 12 Selectivity decreases in the order phosphate >> sulphate ~ nitrate ~ chloride. Therefore, the results show that the loading capacity is similar in presence of the all interfering anions except phosphate which present an interfering effect more pronounced.…”
Section: Selectivity With Interfering Anionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are registered in the Table. 2 with the values of the loading capacity decreasing for each anion. 12 Selectivity decreases in the order phosphate >> sulphate ~ nitrate ~ chloride. Therefore, the results show that the loading capacity is similar in presence of the all interfering anions except phosphate which present an interfering effect more pronounced.…”
Section: Selectivity With Interfering Anionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great variety of water treatment methodologies s such as precipitation [4], oxidation [5], liquid-liquid extraction [6,7], ion exchange [8], membrane processes [9], surface complexation [10] and selective adsorption [11,12] have been studied for significant reduction or remove arsenic from contaminated effluents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they have a strong affinity for transition metal cations, but only little affinity for anions and non-polar organic molecules [19]. The removal of arsenic from solution by zeolites has been investigated mainly on natural and iron exchanged tuffs [20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the seven coagulants and adsorbents, aerobic granular sludge had the highest specific surface area (828.76 m 2 /g), while the surface areas of Ca(OH)2, PACl, AS, PAC, GAC, and zeolite were 267.34 m 2 /g, 211.32 m 2 /g, 654.44 m 2 /g, 562.82 m 2 /g, 484.83 m 2 /g, and 362.54 m 2 /g, respectively. This suggests that the use of aerobic granular sludge may achieve the highest TDS removal efficiency from ROC as the number of active sites available for TDS adsorption is highly dependent on the effective surface area of the coagulants/adsorbents [45]. Figure 3a shows the results of removing TDS from ROC by biosorption with aerobic granular sludge at pH 7.…”
Section: Characterization Of Aerobic Granular Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%