2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr05639g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption and binding dynamics of graphene-supported phospholipid membranes using the QCM-D technique

Abstract: We report on the adsorption dynamics of phospholipid membranes on graphene-coated substrates using the quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) technique. We compare the lipid vescle interaction and membranne formation on gold and silicon dioxide QCM crystal surfaces with their graphene oxide (GO) and reduced (r)GO coated counterparts, and report on the different lipid structures obtained. We establish graphene derivative coatings as support surfaces with tuneable hydrophobicity for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2c), both signals stabilize with a final mass accumulating on the sample calculated to be 776 ng cm À2 (Df min = À39 Hz, calculated from Sauerbrey model, see experimental section for details) while the DD decreasing to DD fin = 1.1 Â 10 À6 . The DD value decreased, indicating a strongly coupled membrane on the film surface and the change of the signal over time is comparable to the ideal case, 39,40 which is an SLB on glass (DD final = 0.4 Â 10 À6 ) (Fig. S8b, ESI †).…”
Section: Slb Formation On P(ndi-t2-l2) Filmsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…2c), both signals stabilize with a final mass accumulating on the sample calculated to be 776 ng cm À2 (Df min = À39 Hz, calculated from Sauerbrey model, see experimental section for details) while the DD decreasing to DD fin = 1.1 Â 10 À6 . The DD value decreased, indicating a strongly coupled membrane on the film surface and the change of the signal over time is comparable to the ideal case, 39,40 which is an SLB on glass (DD final = 0.4 Â 10 À6 ) (Fig. S8b, ESI †).…”
Section: Slb Formation On P(ndi-t2-l2) Filmsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Biomarker detection can be hampered due to intrinsic environmental conditions as sensitivity is reduced in detection in uid compared to detection in vacuum. 96…”
Section: Mechanical/acoustic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their two-dimensional structure, SLBs are well suited for surface-sensitive applications, such as biochips (Chadli et al, 2018) and biosensors (Rebaud et al, 2014). Further, they are highly amenable to analysis by quartz crystal microbalance (Meléndrez et al, 2018), AFM (Bronder et al, 2016), X-ray (Kuhl et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2018), and neutron (Lind et al, 2015) scattering. Although conventional SLBs are formed on hard substrates (e.g., glass), an SLB can alternatively be modified to incorporate a polymer layer (El-khouri et al, 2011; Watkins et al, 2011; Pace et al, 2015; Andersson and Köper, 2016) between the bilayer and underlying hard substrate.…”
Section: Summary and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%