Abstract:Thirty-three patients with inoperable esophageal cancer were treated in a randomized study. There were 24 squamous cell, 2 anaplastic, 4 unclassified, and 3 adenocarcinomas. Eighteen patients were treated with 6 cycles of adriamycin with a 3 week rest period between cycles. Adriamycin was administered in doses of 40 mg/m2 body surface daily for 2 days during each cycle. The other group of 15 patients were treated with both adriamycin and radiation. The tumor was irradiated with speed electrons (4500–5200 rads … Show more
“…Kolaric and coworkers compared efficacy of bleomycin, Adriamycin ® , and bleomycin/Adriamycin ® combination alone and each in combination with radiotherapy. 5,6,21 The multimodality regimens gave overall and complete response rates superior to those of chemotherapy-alone arms in these trials. The bleomycin/Adriamycin ® two-drug regimen disappointingly gave no advantage over results obtained by bleomycin or Adriamycin ® in combination with radiotherapy.…”
Section: Combined Modality Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kolaric, et al reported one complete and five partial responses in 18 patients. 6 The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group compared the activity of Adriamycin ® with those of methotrexate and 5-fiuorouracil (5-FU) in a randomized study. 7 Responses were seen in one of 18 (five percent), two of 27 (seven percent), and four of 26 (15 percent Data on efficacy of new antitumor agents against esophageal cancer are summarized in Table 1.…”
“…Kolaric and coworkers compared efficacy of bleomycin, Adriamycin ® , and bleomycin/Adriamycin ® combination alone and each in combination with radiotherapy. 5,6,21 The multimodality regimens gave overall and complete response rates superior to those of chemotherapy-alone arms in these trials. The bleomycin/Adriamycin ® two-drug regimen disappointingly gave no advantage over results obtained by bleomycin or Adriamycin ® in combination with radiotherapy.…”
Section: Combined Modality Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kolaric, et al reported one complete and five partial responses in 18 patients. 6 The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group compared the activity of Adriamycin ® with those of methotrexate and 5-fiuorouracil (5-FU) in a randomized study. 7 Responses were seen in one of 18 (five percent), two of 27 (seven percent), and four of 26 (15 percent Data on efficacy of new antitumor agents against esophageal cancer are summarized in Table 1.…”
“…Another type of comparison has been made in two randomized trials by Kolaric et al (38,123). CT alone has been compared with CT (doxorubicin + bleomycin or doxorubicin alone) given concurrent with RT showing significantly better response rates when combined therapy was used (38,123).…”
Section: Chemoradiotherapy Without Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT alone has been compared with CT (doxorubicin + bleomycin or doxorubicin alone) given concurrent with RT showing significantly better response rates when combined therapy was used (38,123). In a first study the response rate was 33% vs 60% for doxorubicin and doxorubicin + RT (45-52 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) respectively (123) and in a second study doxorubicin + bleomycin gave a response rate of 19% and doxorubicin + bleomycin + RT (36-40 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) a 60% response rate (38).…”
Section: Chemoradiotherapy Without Surgerymentioning
“…Doxorubicin has shown activity in esophageal and gastric cancer [1][2][3], while in pancreatic and colorectal cancer activity appears low [4,5], Epirubicin is one of a series of new anthracycline antibiotics synthesized in an attempt to identify agents with a superior therapeutic index to the parent com pound doxorubicin. Pharmacokinetics of the two drugs are different and despite the chemical similarity with doxorubicin, epirubicin may have different biologic properties.…”
A review of the activity of epirubicin in advanced gastrointestinal tumors is presented. In gastric cancer epirubicin has comparable activity to its parent compound doxorubicin with less toxicity. Epirubicin seems particularly active in pancreatic cancer as shown by the results of two EORTC Gastrointestinal Group studies. In advanced colorectal cancer results of different studies are conflicting and the drug may have limited activity in rectosigmoid cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.