2014
DOI: 10.1108/el-07-2012-0077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of Web 2.0 in academic libraries of top African universities

Abstract: Purpose – This study aims to explore the extent of Web 2.0 adoption by libraries of top universities in Africa. It focuses on identifying the extent of utilization, types of Web 2.0 technologies adopted and how these technologies are used. Design/methodology/approach – The content analysis method was used. Data was collected by analyzing library websites of 82 top universities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Also, a combination of literature revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More extensive implementation of Web 2.0 technologies has been observed in academic and public libraries from developed countries (for example, Bertot, McDermott, Lincoln, Real, and Peterson, 2012;Chua and Goh, 2010;Kim and Abbas, 2010;Linh, 2008, Tripathi andKumar, 2010), albeit with regional differences in adoption rates and choice of applications. Use of Web 2.0 by libraries in developing regions, such as Sub-Saharan Africa (Wordofa, 2014), is also growing. Hence, although uptake persists for archives and libraries, their social media efforts are still largely experimental.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More extensive implementation of Web 2.0 technologies has been observed in academic and public libraries from developed countries (for example, Bertot, McDermott, Lincoln, Real, and Peterson, 2012;Chua and Goh, 2010;Kim and Abbas, 2010;Linh, 2008, Tripathi andKumar, 2010), albeit with regional differences in adoption rates and choice of applications. Use of Web 2.0 by libraries in developing regions, such as Sub-Saharan Africa (Wordofa, 2014), is also growing. Hence, although uptake persists for archives and libraries, their social media efforts are still largely experimental.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wordofa (2014) and Tait et al (2016) described media sharing/collaboration as web-based services that allow people to store and share contents of various media types such as audios, videos, presentations and documents. Wordofa (2014) emphasised that some media sharing sites such as Youtube, Flickr and Slideshare have standard social networking features that provide people with the ability to share presentations, documents, PDFs and professional videos. Kwanya et al (2012) revealed that Web 2.0 has created an information sharing culture and also enriched the information services with multimedia experiences.…”
Section: Benefits Of Social Media For Academic Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence to remain relevant with the contemporary audiences in the academic environment, the libraries use social media to fulfil their primary responsibility of assisting users in the process of transforming information to knowledge. A substantial number of sources (Agyekum et al, 2016 ;Riza Ayu and Abrizah, 2011;Wordofa, 2014) revealed that Facebook and Twitter are employed by the libraries to build academic networks and promote the exchange of information/knowledge sharing among in the academic environments. Agyekum et al (2016) found that in Ghana, academic librarians used SNS for dissemination of library news, library events, group discussion, general library information, sharing of e-resources, and offering library resources.…”
Section: Benefits Of Social Media For Academic Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations