Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups

Abstract

The adoption of Precision Farming (PF) in Germany has been studied by several mail surveys, telephone interviews and personal interviews with farmers, advisors, teachers and representatives of the PF industry. The intention was to monitor how PF techniques have entered the German market over the years and geographic location. The farmers were interviewed about their experiences with PF technology and their attitudes and barriers towards it. Those farmers who had not yet used PF technologies were asked for the reason and on which condition they would probably start with PF. Although the number of PF users slightly increased between 2001 and 2006, the results of all the surveys indicate that there are still various barriers regarding PF. Those farmers who had already used some PF technologies struggled with many problems at the beginning, but after overcoming these problems, they were generally content with the introduction of PF technologies. However, the majority of the interviewed farmers hesitated to introduce PF techniques mainly because of the high costs of the technology. Most of the interviewed teachers at vocational and technical schools stated that PF was not yet a subject in courses. The interviews with the advisors show that most of them do not offer any advisory service in the field of PF. Finally, the results of the interviews with representatives of the agricultural engineering industry confirm the statements of the other surveys.

Assessing wheat spatial variation based on proximal and remote spectral vegetation indices and soil properties

“…Therefore, despite early enthusiasm following the first applications in the 1980's (Stafford, 2000), PA has not achieved widespread adoption (Yousefi and Razdari, 2015). In fact, although considerable effort has been spent by research and extension services in many countries, only a portion of farmers is willing to apply any type of PA technologies (Reichardt and Jürgens, 2009). …”

Economic benefits of precision weed control and why its uptake is so slow

“…The results of Jacobsen et al (2011) also illustrated the low percentage of farms using more than one precision element and underlined that farmers applying precision technology are bigger farms. Reichardt and Jürgens (2009) reported a low and moderate adoption of precision farming in Germany and emphasised the need to improve the offi cial advisory service.…”

Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping: A New Framework for Innovation-Based Regional Development

“…[42,52]). Compared to the U.S. and other European countries, such as Denmark, the U.K. and Sweden, the adoption rate of precision farming technologies in Germany has been relatively slow [53][54][55]. Experts have stressed the advantages of this technology, but farmers have been difficult to convince.…”