Adopting distributed pair programming as an effective team learning activity: a systematic review

Abstract

As online learning has become an inevitable trend in the post-peak era of the COVID-19 pandemic, distributed pair programming (DPP) is gaining momentum in both education and industry. DDP serves as a collaborative programming approach and also benefits the development of computational thinking, a fundamental skill in today’s world. This study conducted a systematic review of studies on DPP published after 2010 to understand the themes and factors that impact the team effectiveness of DPP and thus inform future research and practices on how to better leverage this approach for teaching and learning. The results showed that individual characteristics attracted major investigations in the selected 23 studies, including prior programming experience, actual skill, perceived skill, gender, personality, time management, confidence, and self-esteem, with pair compatibility identified as a critical team design factor that significantly affects programmers’ satisfaction. Although the feel-good factor in the team process was investigated, no significant impact was found. Under the team environment theme, we compared different opinions on the orientation (e.g., scripted roles) and the use of technology (e.g., integrated development environment tools). Future research should investigate how task structure influences team effectiveness of DPP and relates to computational thinking education. Additionally, because most studies were conducted in higher education contexts, more research in primary and secondary educational contexts is also needed.

Generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning: A review based on academic databases

“…both in the prospect of securing future employment and in the desire to acquire the skills necessary for roles driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence, as confirmed by the study by Kelly, Sullivan, and Strampel (2023). These results offer an overview of three key areas: learning outcomes (Bower et al 2024), pedagogy (Xu & Correia, 2023), and evaluation (Kiryakova & Angelova, 2023).…”

Active Learning Methodologies for Teaching Programming in Undergraduate Courses: A Systematic Mapping Study

“…PP is an active learning methodology that compares pair programming and solo programming. Its effectiveness is affected by compatibility factors such as students' skills, personality, and self-esteem (Xu and Correia, 2023). TBL develops critical thinking skills and problemsolving ability to solve problems individually and empowers students to solve complex issues (Sibley and Ostafichuk, 2023).…”

Random and systematic errors in pairwise computer programming: A systematic review

“…Xu and Correia (2023) conducted a systematic review of DPP studies published after 2010 to understand the issues and factors that impact the effectiveness of the DPP team. 36 The results showed that individual characteristics such as previous programming experience, actual and perceived ability, gender, personality, time management, confidence, and self-esteem had been the subject of significant research. Regardless of the investigations, studies focused on specifically analyzing random and systematic errors concerning the problem posed have yet to be found.…”