1995
DOI: 10.1080/0144341950150204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents’ Perceptions of Young People with Severe Learning Difficulties: the effects of integration schemes and frequency of contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
15
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…14,16,17,21,22,30,32,[34][35][36][37]40,[45][46][47]49 These studies all showed that the more contact children had with people with disabilities, the more positive their attitudes were towards disability. From the nine articles in which effect sizes were available or calculated, effect size d ranged from 0.17 to 2.45 (Table I).…”
Section: Main Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,16,17,21,22,30,32,[34][35][36][37]40,[45][46][47]49 These studies all showed that the more contact children had with people with disabilities, the more positive their attitudes were towards disability. From the nine articles in which effect sizes were available or calculated, effect size d ranged from 0.17 to 2.45 (Table I).…”
Section: Main Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,[39][40][41] In addition to self-reported attitude measures, other techniques included asking children questions about how they would respond to a disabled child described in a written vignette. 12,32,42 One study used a 'post-box' technique, 25 which involved participants posting pictures of children with and without disabilities into boxes labelled in stages from 'always' to 'never' to represent how much they would like to play or work with them. Finally, two studies used peer nomination methods, which involved participants ranking or nominating children in their class or school with whom they would most like to interact.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three instruments (Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children, 30 Acceptance Scale for Kindergarteners, 14,31 and Pictographic Scale 32,33 ) were excluded because they were developed for use with preschool-age children. One instrument (Children's Attitudes Towards Integrated Physical Education 34 ) was excluded because it measured attitudes towards integration rather than attitudes towards children with disabilities; one (Test of Attitudes Towards Children with Disabilities [35][36][37][38][39] ) was not used because there was insufficient information available; and four instruments 13,15,17,40 were excluded because they were devised by their authors for one or two specific studies, and because insufficient evidence of sound instrument development or psychometric properties was reported.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krajewski & Hyde, 2000) και άλλοτε αρνητικά (Gash & Coffey, 1995 . Hastings & Graham, 1995 . Nabors & Keyes, 1997) τη στάση των μαθητών.…”
Section: δείγμαunclassified