2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescents' differential responses to social media browsing: Exploring causes and consequences for intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps due to the high visuality and positive self-presentation tendencies of SNSs (Vogel and Rose, 2016), passive SNS browsing, as a whole, is linked to poorer well-being, including greater depressed mood Eggermont, 2016, 2017, for girls only;Escobar-Viera et al, 2018;Burnell et al, 2019;Thorisdottir et al, 2019;but see Beyens et al, 2020) and loneliness (Frison and Eggermont, 2020). Experimental studies in which participants browse content preselected by the researchers (which usually exemplifies especially highly positive self-presentation) have found that Instagram browsing can decrease positive mood, particularly for those who are likely to compare themselves to this content (Weinstein, 2017;de Vries et al, 2018), and can also increase negative mood (Brown and Tiggemann, 2016;Weinstein, 2017). Experiments with "real" SNS content (in which participants log into their personal SNS account and browse others' content) have thus far focused on Facebook, and have found that browsing Facebook can increase negative mood (Fardouly et al, 2015), and decrease positive mood (Yuen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Browsing Others' Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps due to the high visuality and positive self-presentation tendencies of SNSs (Vogel and Rose, 2016), passive SNS browsing, as a whole, is linked to poorer well-being, including greater depressed mood Eggermont, 2016, 2017, for girls only;Escobar-Viera et al, 2018;Burnell et al, 2019;Thorisdottir et al, 2019;but see Beyens et al, 2020) and loneliness (Frison and Eggermont, 2020). Experimental studies in which participants browse content preselected by the researchers (which usually exemplifies especially highly positive self-presentation) have found that Instagram browsing can decrease positive mood, particularly for those who are likely to compare themselves to this content (Weinstein, 2017;de Vries et al, 2018), and can also increase negative mood (Brown and Tiggemann, 2016;Weinstein, 2017). Experiments with "real" SNS content (in which participants log into their personal SNS account and browse others' content) have thus far focused on Facebook, and have found that browsing Facebook can increase negative mood (Fardouly et al, 2015), and decrease positive mood (Yuen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Browsing Others' Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, empirical evidence suggests that younger adults are more likely to report experiencing FoMO (Przybylski et al, 2013;Blackwell et al, 2017). As it is well-established in experimental studies that the negative effects of browsing are exacerbated for those who engage in social comparison (Vogel et al, 2015;Weinstein, 2017;de Vries et al, 2018;Alfasi, 2019), we focused specifically on FoMO in the current research, which has yet to be explored as a moderator.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empirical study of the effect of Instagram browsing on affect in just more than 500 adolescents found that randomization to conditions that provided greater contextual awareness regarding posts by others mitigated against postbrowsing negative affect in teens who reported higher levels of negative social comparison. 54 Sleep hygiene measures specific to social media and smartphone usage are crucial, as several studies have shown that increased smartphone use can disrupt sleep and shorten sleep duration. These would include avoiding use of electronic screens within 1 to 2 hours before bedtime, and not having portable, screen-based media devices in bedrooms overnight.…”
Section: How Might Physicians Use This Evidence To Inform Their Practmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with these correlational findings, experimental research has demonstrated negative effects on well-being and body confidence of viewing Instagram feeds. For example, following browsing of simulated Instagram feeds which featured gender-matched profiles of a teen model (female) or teen athlete (male), mid-adolescent American girls and boys experienced adverse effects on their positive and negative affect 40. Specifically, participants who engaged in negative social comparisons while viewing the Instagram profiles had lower positive affect and higher negative affect after viewing the images 40.…”
Section: Impact Of Selfie Practices On Well-being and Body Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, following browsing of simulated Instagram feeds which featured gender-matched profiles of a teen model (female) or teen athlete (male), mid-adolescent American girls and boys experienced adverse effects on their positive and negative affect 40. Specifically, participants who engaged in negative social comparisons while viewing the Instagram profiles had lower positive affect and higher negative affect after viewing the images 40. Although the proportion of images that were selfies versus non-selfie profile images on these Instagram feeds was not specified in this research, it is likely that they contained a high number of selfies, as this is typically the case with Instagram profiles 41.…”
Section: Impact Of Selfie Practices On Well-being and Body Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%