2017
DOI: 10.12707/riv16058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent pregnancy and local co-planning: a diagnostic approach based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This creates the ironic situation where adolescent rights to participate in a study to cast their opinion are denied while they already are taking on adult life roles (i.e., becoming a father and mother). This difficulty was evident in the development of PHR on teenage pregnancy and was overcome by the inclusion of a peer education process (Alves et al, 2017(Alves et al, , 2020.…”
Section: The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This creates the ironic situation where adolescent rights to participate in a study to cast their opinion are denied while they already are taking on adult life roles (i.e., becoming a father and mother). This difficulty was evident in the development of PHR on teenage pregnancy and was overcome by the inclusion of a peer education process (Alves et al, 2017(Alves et al, , 2020.…”
Section: The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of voices and opinions of children and adolescents in the development of public policy has been advocated globally as an important strategy for health practices and research guidelines (Patton et al, 2016). This inclusive approach is particularly relevant for addressing ongoing inequities, emerging issues, and controversial topics that impact the current generation of youth and children (Alves et al, 2017; Ybarra et al, 2016; Zulu, 2018). Current debates are also aligned with emerging epistemologies that challenge hegemonic and non-inclusive traditions of research (Santos and Meneses, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%