Adolescent aggression: The role of peer group status motives, peer aggression, and group characteristics

Abstract

Recent studies of youth aggression have emphasized the role of network-based peer influence processes. Other scholars have suggested that aggression is often motivated by status concerns. We integrate these two veins of research by considering the effects of peer status motivations on subsequent adolescent aggression, net of their own status motivations, prior aggression, and peer behavior. We also explore different levels at which peer effects may occur, considering the effects of reciprocated and unreciprocated friendships as well as larger, meso-level peer groups. We anticipate that peer group effects are magnified by both size and boundedness as measured by Freeman’s (1972) Segregation Index. We find that, net of the adolescent’s aggression at time 1, both the aggressive behaviors and the status valuations of friends independently increase the likelihood of aggression at time 2, six months later. The aggressive behavior of friends who do not reciprocate the adolescent’s friendship nomination has particular impact. The average status valuation of peer groups increases their members’ likelihood of aggression, even after controlling for their own attitudes about status, their friends’ attitudes, and their friends’ aggressive behavior. This effect is magnified in large groups and groups with high Freeman segregation scores.

Movement without mobility: Adolescent status hierarchies and the contextual limits of cumulative advantage

“…Status is not, however, merely a means to win resources, but is an end to itself. The majority of adolescents in our study felt that "being popular" was somewhat or very important, and status valuation predicts subsequent aggression and other risk behaviors ( Faris and Ennett, 2012;Sijtsema et al, 2009). Park and Burgess (1921, p. 30;quoted in Bothner et al, 2010a andBothner et al, 2010b) observed that "men work for wages…they will die to preserve their status.…”

Bullies and Victims in Primary Schools

“…Bullying is a serious form of aggression since it has several adverse effects on the victimized students. Victims are likely to experience anxiety, depression, low selfesteem, mental and physical health problems, and isolation from peers (Faris and Ennett, 2012;McKenney et al, 2006). Furthermore, victimization might have negative consequences on students' school performance (Eisenberg et al, 2003).…”

A Framework for the Analysis of Student Well-Being in the PISA 2015 Study

“…It depends on the context in which individuals operate and the limits, boundaries and checks that are imposed on peer-to-peer interactions (Card and Hodges, 2006;Faris and Ennett, 2012;Hawkins et al, 2001;Salmivalli et al, 1996).…”