D uring the last two decades, there have been tremendous advances in the recognition and management of ectopic pregnancies (EPs); nevertheless, EP remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. In westernised countries like the United Kingdom, the rate of EP is 11/ 1000 pregnancies with maternal mortality of 0.2/1000 (NICE guidelines 2012). While in the United States of America 9% of maternal mortality is attributed to EP. 1 In Australia, there were three maternal deaths between 2006 and 2010 (in comparison with two between 2000 and 2005) all of which were preventable. 2 The rates of EP are even higher in developing countries. 3 Importantly, we must also not underestimate the psychological trauma associated with EP and the impact on future fertility. 4 Early recognition and prompt referral are key factors to prevent catastrophic events such as tubal rupture and collapse. Early diagnosis allows the clinician to decide for more conservative approaches in EP management avoiding surgery and its associated risks of anaesthesia, blood loss and inadvertent injury to vascular and other pelvic structures at the time of laparoscopy.Ultrasound is the imaging method of choice to diagnose EP. In the 1970s, the diagnosis of EP was based upon non-visualisation of a gestational sac inside the uterus, utilising transabdominal scan at different cut-off values of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). 5 ln the 1980s and 1990s, transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) was introduced and became widely used, resulting in earlier recognition of the EP mass at lower levels of quantitative hCG. 6 The diagnosis of EP in modern practice is based upon the positive visualisation of an extrauterine mass on TVS 2,3 rather than the absence of an intrauterine gestational sac. At the first presentation, TVS has a sensitivity of 73.9-74.7% in detecting EP, and the overall sensitivity of TVS in detecting EP in subsequent visits is 87-99% with specificity of 94-99%. 7,8 There are four distinct TVS morphologic criteria used to classify women with a tubal EP: (i) an inhomogeneous mass or 'blob' sign adjacent to the ovary and moving separately from the ovary; or (ii) a mass with a hyper-echoic ring around the gestational sac or 'bagel' sign; or (iii) a gestational sac with an embryonic pole with cardiac activity; or (iv) a gestational sac with an embryonic pole without cardiac activity. According to a consensus statement in 2011, 9 only the presence of a gestational sac with embryo (with or without cardiac activity) is considered to be a definite diagnosis of EP. According to the same consensus, the other two morphological ultrasound types 'blob' and 'bagel' signs are classified as probable EPs. The prevalence of these different morphological types in TVS has changed over the years. The most common morphological types are the 'blob' and 'bagel' signs accounting for almost 80% of all tubal EPs, whilst the presence of an embryo with or without cardiac activity accounts for 10-13%. 10,11 The association between these different EP morphologica...