2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2933425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADN: Artifact Disentanglement Network for Unsupervised Metal Artifact Reduction

Abstract: Current deep neural network based approaches to computed tomography (CT) metal artifact reduction (MAR) are supervised methods that rely on synthesized metal artifacts for training. However, as synthesized data may not accurately simulate the underlying physical mechanisms of CT imaging, the supervised methods often generalize poorly to clinical applications. To address this problem, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first unsupervised learning approach to MAR. Specifically, we introduce a novel ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While training, we used the Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2014) with its default parameters and a decaying cyclical learning rate scheduler (Smith, 2017) with a base learning rate of 2 • 10 −6 and a maximum learning rate of 2 • 10 −3 . The choice of optimizer was based on knowledge of previous image translation literature (Isola et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2017;Liao et al, 2019;Ranzini et al, 2020) where it yielded good results. At the same time, a varying learning rate during training was shown to improve results in fewer iterations when compared to using a fixed value (Smith, 2017).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While training, we used the Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2014) with its default parameters and a decaying cyclical learning rate scheduler (Smith, 2017) with a base learning rate of 2 • 10 −6 and a maximum learning rate of 2 • 10 −3 . The choice of optimizer was based on knowledge of previous image translation literature (Isola et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2017;Liao et al, 2019;Ranzini et al, 2020) where it yielded good results. At the same time, a varying learning rate during training was shown to improve results in fewer iterations when compared to using a fixed value (Smith, 2017).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest problem for deep learning MAR is that training data must be generated artificially, leading to disparities between artifacts in the training and real artifacts. Methods to treat this problem have been proposed as well 7,23–25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21], a review was provided for the state-of-art technologies in metal artifact reduction, and the limitations of these technologies were also pointed out. Most recently, machine leaning methods are explored to battle the metal artifacts in CT [22][23][24][25]. In ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [22], an unsupervised deep neural network artifact disentanglement network was proposed to decouple the metal artifacts and the CT images for clinical applications. Reference [23] suggested a conditional generative adversarial network CGAN for data domain sinogram [24] reported a convolutional neural network based metal artifact reduction (CNN-MAR) framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation