2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admissions Rate and Timing of Revascularization in the United States in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of left main coronary artery and left circumflex coronary artery as a culprit lesion was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients than in STEMI patients in this study, suggesting that NSETMI population included high-risk subset of patients who presented “non-ST elevation” electrocardiographic findings, but had a “STEMI like” hemodynamic consequence during evolving myocardial infarction. The recent study reported the favorable clinical outcome of shorter door to balloon time even in NSTEMI population, suggesting the importance of appropriate risk stratification and timely reperfusion therapy in NSTEMI population [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of left main coronary artery and left circumflex coronary artery as a culprit lesion was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients than in STEMI patients in this study, suggesting that NSETMI population included high-risk subset of patients who presented “non-ST elevation” electrocardiographic findings, but had a “STEMI like” hemodynamic consequence during evolving myocardial infarction. The recent study reported the favorable clinical outcome of shorter door to balloon time even in NSTEMI population, suggesting the importance of appropriate risk stratification and timely reperfusion therapy in NSTEMI population [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Among patients suffering an AMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation MI (NSTEMI) is approximately twice as common as ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 2 The efficacy of immediate reperfusion in the setting of STEMI is well established, consistent with the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion and thrombosis. 3 In patients with NSTEMI, the efficacy of an invasive strategy with revascularization in appropriate patients is also well established.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Of these hospitalizations, 50.3% involved diagnostic angiography, with 34.1% revascularized. 2 Of revascularized patients, 77.6% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 22.4% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was frequently performed on the day of admission, the majority occurred over the next several days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 Although symptom-to-revascularization time is less frequently studied in patients with NSTEMI/UA, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in high-risk patients when revascularization is delayed. 30 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%