2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Admissible Evidence in the Court of Development Evaluation? The Impact of CARE’s SHOUHARDO Project on Child Stunting in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Population density and the density of open defecation are factors that were identified to be strongly associated with stunting in a comparative analysis of 130 Demographic & Health Surveys (DHS) cross-sectional surveys [19]. There are several studies that report stunting as significantly less prevalent in families with higher socioeconomic status and increases with poverty, environmental factors, a non-utilization of health services, and lack of parental education [20,21,22,23]. Levels of parental education, and in particular maternal education, inversely affect stunting, as demonstrated through a cross-sectional analysis of the Demographic and Health Surveys for low and middle-income countries [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population density and the density of open defecation are factors that were identified to be strongly associated with stunting in a comparative analysis of 130 Demographic & Health Surveys (DHS) cross-sectional surveys [19]. There are several studies that report stunting as significantly less prevalent in families with higher socioeconomic status and increases with poverty, environmental factors, a non-utilization of health services, and lack of parental education [20,21,22,23]. Levels of parental education, and in particular maternal education, inversely affect stunting, as demonstrated through a cross-sectional analysis of the Demographic and Health Surveys for low and middle-income countries [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings, when contrasted with the scientific evidence on health and nutrition interventions focused on reducing the delay in length in children under 5 years, are relevant because it has been described that those interventions of greater efficacy to reduce the prevalence of delay in length in children under 5 years are those that at least obtained a 3.0% change in the prevalence of length delay in the intervened population, with an exposure greater than or equal to 12 months [ 13 ] . In Bangladesh, CARE’s SHOUHARDO project, a nutrition intervention that links work with poverty and gender inequalities, achieved a 4.5 percentage point reduction in stunting in children aged 6–24 months [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By triangulating among qualitative and quantitative analyses, we found mixed methods provided a fuller evaluation of impact than either approach could alone (Smith et al, 2012;Spilsbury and Nasi, 2006). Using the survey with a comparison group allowed us to estimate what we would have observed had the initiative not occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%