Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context

Nedović‐Budić, Zorica

doi:10.1080/01944360108976354

Cited by 80 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hoffman (1994) or Maier (1998) pointed out these facts in the 1990s. In the new millennium this topic has been professionally discussed in detail by Maier (2001), Nedović-Budić (2001), and Spilková and Perlín (2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the countries there are, in these views, significant peculiarities, but on the other hand there are also some common features and trends. This topic was discussed in internationally accepted journals by Nedović-Budić (2001), where she recommends preserving some of the positive aspects of socialist spatial planning or Ruoppila (2007). A suitable model for education and ethical principles, and for the participation of the public in post-socialist spatial planning is searched for (Maier, 1994(Maier, , 1998.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Regulation of Residential Suburbanisation in Hinterland of Post-socialist ‘One Hundred Thousands’ City of České Budějovice

Kubeš

2015

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Residential suburbanisation is currently the most important urbanisation process transforming metropolitan areas in European post-socialist countries, especially in Central Europe and at Baltic states. The paper compares the statements of the mayors of the suburban municipalities situated in the hinterland of the city of České Budějovice (a one-hundred-thousand city in the South-West of the Czech Republic) and also the local building officials, spatial planning ofcials and experts regarding the recent, currently on-going and upcoming construction of houses in the suburbs and the regulation of these constructions. Further, it discusses the possibilities of influencing the construction of the houses through the spatial plans of municipalities, settlement zones, and metropolitan areas. The interviewed mayors consider, rather uncritically, the recent large construction of houses in their suburbs in general as appropriate. One third of the mayors, however, do not want any further suburban development of this kind. Spatial planning officials and building officials do not have sufficiently powerful tools to influence the extent of the construction and the designs of houses in the individual suburban municipalities and their suburbs. Some of them, together with the experts, support the reintroduction of the metropolitan area spatial plan.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Regulation of Residential Suburbanisation in Hinterland of Post-socialist ‘One Hundred Thousands’ City of České Budějovice

Kubeš

2015

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Single-party political systems, strong ideological anchoring, state ownership of the means of production (land included), rejection of market principles and a wide preference for collective interests -these are some of the distinctive characteristics of socialist regimes (Musil, 2001;Nedovic-Budic, 2001), when compared with capitalist societies in the period after WW II. In spite of such unifying symptoms of socialist order, however, there were numerous types of socialist societies, a variety of socialist frameworks stemming from specific historical legacies of the pre-socialist periods and from different adaptations of ideological premises to local milieu (Hamilton, 1976).…”

Section: Territorial Cohesion In Socialist Planning Doctrines Up To Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

European territorial cohesion policies: Parallels to socialist central planning?

Malý

Mulíček

2016

Moravian Geographical Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The new circumstances have prompted not only new institutions but also a "new notion of planning" that strives to regain its legitimacy, become more flexible, and adapt to the new economic and political circumstances [2]). In those dynamics, an idiosyncratic mix of old, new and innovative practices interjects into the transforming reality [4] The transition of societies and cities from communist to post-communist, therefore, involves -among other things -new systems of government (or governance); new legal, constitutional and institutional frameworks; new economic order; new rules of social integration; and new policy choices for privatization and redistribution of public assets [1]. The theory of transition is rooted in the democratization theory that views transition as primarily a political process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Failure of Planning Endevour in North East Border Area of Serbia Towards Bulgaria

Djordjević¹,

Vasiljevic²

2017

Geobalcanica Proceedings 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the transition, spatial planning was supposed to mitigate the negative effects of the new player -market to the public interest. But, seems like our planning didn't find the mechanisms to mitigate those effects created by the market inside it. Planning institutions in pretransitional period were exclusively in public sector. We now have on one side, some big planning institution, partially financed from the state's budget usually with the monopoly over elaboration of one group of plans and on the other side, smaller ones which are being privatized. Both are thrown to the market and are trying to acquire as much engagements as possible in order to secure enough financing. They are producing more plans for less money in a shorter period of time. As a result, these former public agents diverted by the new hostile conditions given by undeveloped market and neoliberal environment are still presenting traditional rigid planning model, deterministic and inflexible, with fixed land use parameters and regulations. Seems like the turbulent times in which the most important task is to survive didn't give them a chance to develop and to introduce more innovative and novel models in view of participative, strategic and action plan oriented planning. The failure of planning enterprise to achieve at least some balance in regional inequity is clearly visible in peripheral, i.e. border areas. The paper discuss the main objectives and planning concepts in various overlapping planning documents on national, regional and local levels elaborated for Timočka krajina, a border region situated in NE Serbia towards a frontier to Bulgaria, and the obvious gap between planning optimism and accurate demographic, social and economic decline of the region, despite both local and European based, mostly cross border related projects and initiatives.

show abstract

Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context

Cited by 80 publications

References 49 publications

Analysis of Regulation of Residential Suburbanisation in Hinterland of Post-socialist ‘One Hundred Thousands’ City of České Budějovice

Analysis of Regulation of Residential Suburbanisation in Hinterland of Post-socialist ‘One Hundred Thousands’ City of České Budějovice

European territorial cohesion policies: Parallels to socialist central planning?

The Failure of Planning Endevour in North East Border Area of Serbia Towards Bulgaria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About