2000
DOI: 10.1093/oep/52.1.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment dynamics and the natural rate: an account of UK unemployment

Abstract: This paper challenges what is the standard account of UK unemployment, namely that the major swings in unemployment over the past 25 years are due predominantly to movements in the underlying empirical "natural rate of unemployment" (NRU). Our analysis suggests that the British NRU has remained reasonable stable through time and that the medium-run swings in unemployment are due, instead, to very prolonged after-effects of persistent (transitory but long-lasting) shocks. We argue that (a) past UK labour market… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative way of looking at the association between wages and unemployment benefits is to consider the replacement rate (figures 1c and 1d). The picture in this case is somewhat different: the replacement rate rose in the first part of the 1980s and remained stable in the interval between the unemployment benefits' reforms of 1992 and 8 The analytical developments of such arguments lie far beyond the scope of this paper and are left for future research. 9 10 This is the proportion of unemployment benefits (averaged over the different types of recipients) of average earnings before tax.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alternative way of looking at the association between wages and unemployment benefits is to consider the replacement rate (figures 1c and 1d). The picture in this case is somewhat different: the replacement rate rose in the first part of the 1980s and remained stable in the interval between the unemployment benefits' reforms of 1992 and 8 The analytical developments of such arguments lie far beyond the scope of this paper and are left for future research. 9 10 This is the proportion of unemployment benefits (averaged over the different types of recipients) of average earnings before tax.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An alternative to the institutionalist approach is the CRT: 3 it focuses on the importance of the lagged adjustment processes and outlines the central role of the growth drivers in explaining the unemployment trajectory. For example, Henry, Karanassou and Snower (2000) and Snower (2003 and2004) find capital stock to be a crucial determinant of unemployment in the UK and the EU. The empirical methodology of the CRT involves the estimation of multi-equation systems (with a wage setting equation always considered) and yields a salient result: the influence of the growth drivers is found to overcome the importance of wage pressure factors in To confront these two views, the Spanish wage setting curve is estimated to test: (i) to what extent the 'usual suspects' from the institutionalist view are relevant in a dynamic framework; and (ii) the relevance of a growth driver such as the ratio of public to private capital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a review, see Karanassou (1998), Karanassou and Snower (1997 and Henry, Karanassou and Snower (2000), among others. 3 The theoretical underpinnings for the specification of each equation are set out in Karanassou and Snower (2000).…”
Section: Literature Review 1 Chain Reaction Theory: Concept and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of autoregressive multi-equation models, movements in unemployment can be viewed as "chain reactions" of responses to labor market shockshence the epithet 'Chain Reaction Theory'of this approach -working their way through systems of interacting lagged adjustment processes. 10 These labor market frictions make current decision variables of labor market participants depend both on past and future labor market conditions. In the simple model below we focus on the role of training costs.…”
Section: Insights With Prolonged Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%