2012
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2012.736993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusted Pearson residuals in beta regression models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the difference involves the link function(s), a larger sample size is needed. 1 How do the J and MJ perform when the correct model is not among the competing models, i.e. when none of the models under consideration is the true model?…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When the difference involves the link function(s), a larger sample size is needed. 1 How do the J and MJ perform when the correct model is not among the competing models, i.e. when none of the models under consideration is the true model?…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrari and Cribari-Neto [21] introduced the class of beta regression models using an alternative parameterization for the density in Equation (1). Let μ = p/(p + q) and φ = p + q, then p = μφ and q = (1 − μ)φ.…”
Section: The Beta Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first three belongs to the class introduced in this paper, but using other residuals as r i instead of the quantile residual. We used the standardized weighted residual 1 (Espinheira et al, 2008), the standardized weighted residual 2 (Espinheira et al, 2008) and the adjusted standardized weighted residual 1 (Anholeto et al, 2014) For each of the observations and residuals, we calculated the percentage of the residuals smaller than −3, −2, −1 and greater than 1, 2, 3 among the 25, 000 replications. When y i = 0, the residuals are not defined and we considered that they are neither smaller than -1 and nor greater than 1.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%