2011
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2011-158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustable TXOP mechanism for supporting video transmission in IEEE 802.11e HCCA

Abstract: The basic mechanism of HCCA (HCF Control Channel Access) has been introduced in IEEE 802.11e standard to support the parameterized QoS by allocating a fixed duration based on the requested TSPEC requirements during the admission control process. However, the variable bit rate (VBR) traffic (e.g., MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video) cannot be surely supported. In this study, the adjustable TXOP mechanism for supporting video transmission, ATMV, has been proposed. The mechanism adaptively adjusts the TXOP duration accordin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MAC layer, the uplink traffic profile can be determined using different ways, such as estimating the data buffer of the flow, predicting the packet generation time and/or traffic load at a specific time, or obtaining actual information through cross-layer architecture design. By having the traffic profile, the HCF can adjust one or more of its functions such as polling [22], SI assignment [23], TXOP allocation mechanisms [24] which allows it to instantaneously adapt to QoS requirement of the flow.…”
Section: A Adaptation To Fluctuation Of Application Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In MAC layer, the uplink traffic profile can be determined using different ways, such as estimating the data buffer of the flow, predicting the packet generation time and/or traffic load at a specific time, or obtaining actual information through cross-layer architecture design. By having the traffic profile, the HCF can adjust one or more of its functions such as polling [22], SI assignment [23], TXOP allocation mechanisms [24] which allows it to instantaneously adapt to QoS requirement of the flow.…”
Section: A Adaptation To Fluctuation Of Application Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published from 2004 to 2009 Published since 2010 HCCA Polling [95], [65], [96], [63], [97], [77], [98], [99], [100] [78], [101], [31], [102], [103], [48], [104], [105], [79], [106] TXOP Allocation [56], [18], [66], [107], [81], [108], [109], [25], [110], [111], [112], [54], [29], [39], [55], [24], [113], [61], [34], [36] [114], [38], [115], [62], [116] [59], [60], [26] [92] Admission Control [88], [117], [118], [66], [119], [120]...…”
Section: Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches such as [4,5,27,33,34,41] have been presented in the literature attempting to remedy the deficiency of the HCCA reference scheduler in supporting QoS for VBR traffics. However, these enhancements are still not sufficient to cope with the fast fluctuating nature of highly compressed video applications since the QSTAs are scheduled according to an estimation about the uplink TSs characteristic which may be far from the real traffics.…”
Section: Transmission Of Mpeg-4 Video In Hccamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, HCCA can provide QoS guarantees through resource reservation but it is a centralized and more complex scheme, which is useful in infrastructure networks only [10]. HCCA transfer protocol defines a time parameter which is called transmission opportunity (TXOP) [15], which refers to a time duration during which a Quality of Service Station (QSTA) is allowed to transmit a burst of data frames. These bounded time intervals were introduced to solve the problem with unknown transmission times of polled stations in PCF.…”
Section: Ieee 80211e Hccamentioning
confidence: 99%