World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2014 2014
DOI: 10.1061/9780784413548.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Modeling of Contaminant Fate and Transport in Riverbank Filtration Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In hydrogeology, the adjoint state method has been employed in many applications including interpretation of interference tests using geostastistical techniques (de Marsily et al, 1984), steady-state groundwater flow (Sykes et al, 1985;Wilson & Metcalfe, 1985), groundwater travel time uncertainty analysis (LaVenue et al, 1989), automated calibration of transmissivity fields (LaVenue et al, 1995;RamaRao et al, 1995), coupled nonlinear multiphase multicomponent flow (RamaRao & Mishra, 1996), modeling multidimensional groundwater flow (Clemo, 2007), adaptive multiscale parameterization of flow in unsaturated porous media (Hayek et al, 2008), transient groundwater flow in a bounded model domain (Lu & Vesselinov, 2015), fractured dual-porosity media (Delay et al, 2017;Fahs et al, 2014), and coupled surface water-groundwater modeling (RamaRao et al, 2017). However, few applications of the adjoint state method have been devoted to solute transport (e.g., Larbkich et al, 2014;Michalak & Kitanidis, 2004;Neupauer & Wilson, 1999, 2001Piasecki & Katopodes, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hydrogeology, the adjoint state method has been employed in many applications including interpretation of interference tests using geostastistical techniques (de Marsily et al, 1984), steady-state groundwater flow (Sykes et al, 1985;Wilson & Metcalfe, 1985), groundwater travel time uncertainty analysis (LaVenue et al, 1989), automated calibration of transmissivity fields (LaVenue et al, 1995;RamaRao et al, 1995), coupled nonlinear multiphase multicomponent flow (RamaRao & Mishra, 1996), modeling multidimensional groundwater flow (Clemo, 2007), adaptive multiscale parameterization of flow in unsaturated porous media (Hayek et al, 2008), transient groundwater flow in a bounded model domain (Lu & Vesselinov, 2015), fractured dual-porosity media (Delay et al, 2017;Fahs et al, 2014), and coupled surface water-groundwater modeling (RamaRao et al, 2017). However, few applications of the adjoint state method have been devoted to solute transport (e.g., Larbkich et al, 2014;Michalak & Kitanidis, 2004;Neupauer & Wilson, 1999, 2001Piasecki & Katopodes, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjoint method has been employed to calculate the sensitivity of the head or drawdown to hydraulic parameters (conductivity/transmissivity, storage coefficient/storativity) for steady state flow [ Neuman , ; Sykes et al ., ; Mazzilli et al ., ], transient flow [ Carrera and Medina , ; Zhu and Yeh , ; Sun et al ., ; Mao et al ., ], variably saturated flow [ Li and Yeh , ; Hughson and Yeh , ; Li and Yeh , ], and multilayer aquifer systems [ Lu et al ., ]. Applications of the adjoint method in solute transport include determining the sensitivity of the solute concentration to the source intensity [ Piasecki and Katopodes , ], the contamination source location and travel time probability and distribution [ Neupauer and Wilson , ; Larbkich et al ., ], and estimates of the historical groundwater contamination distribution [ Michalak and Kitanidis , ]. Other applications of the method in groundwater hydrology include combining the adjoint method with the level set method to identify heterogeneity in porous media [ Lu and Robinson , ] and selection of well locations for minimizing stream depletion [ Neupauer and Cronin , ], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%