2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr016819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical sensitivity analysis of transient groundwater flow in a bounded model domain using the adjoint method

Abstract: Sensitivity analyses are an important component of any modeling exercise. We have developed an analytical methodology based on the adjoint method to compute sensitivities of a state variable (hydraulic head) to model parameters (hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient) for transient groundwater flow in a confined and randomly heterogeneous aquifer under ambient and pumping conditions. For a special case of two-dimensional rectangular domains, these sensitivities are represented in terms of the problem c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ( ) r fh J (n×m) is the sensitivity of head with respect to the change of parameter. The sensitivity matrix is evaluated using the adjoint state approach [Li and Yeh, 1998;Li and Yeh, 1999;Lu and Vesselinov, 2015]. After completion of the linear estimation, the conditional residual covariance of ( 1) r + f is updated subsequently by…”
Section: Successive Linear Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ( ) r fh J (n×m) is the sensitivity of head with respect to the change of parameter. The sensitivity matrix is evaluated using the adjoint state approach [Li and Yeh, 1998;Li and Yeh, 1999;Lu and Vesselinov, 2015]. After completion of the linear estimation, the conditional residual covariance of ( 1) r + f is updated subsequently by…”
Section: Successive Linear Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These coefficients reflect the sensitivities of user-defined scalar measures of system behavior or model performance, called performance measures, to various model parameters. For instance, they are used to determine the relative sensitivity of performance measures with respect to the parameters of the system (Lu & Vesselinov, 2015;Sykes et al, 1985;Wilson & Metcalfe, 1985), to guide gradient search in nonlinear optimization (Hayek et al, 2008), or to perform firstand second-order, second-moment uncertainty analyses (Li & Yeh, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjoint state method has been used successfully in a wide range of disciplines such as mathematical physics, geophysics, systems engineering, economics, constrained optimization, nuclear engineering, electrical engineering, meteorology, oceanography, hydrogeology, petroleum engineering, and seismology. In hydrogeology, the adjoint state method has been employed in many applications including interpretation of interference tests using geostastistical techniques (de Marsily et al, 1984), steady-state groundwater flow (Sykes et al, 1985;Wilson & Metcalfe, 1985), groundwater travel time uncertainty analysis (LaVenue et al, 1989), automated calibration of transmissivity fields (LaVenue et al, 1995;RamaRao et al, 1995), coupled nonlinear multiphase multicomponent flow (RamaRao & Mishra, 1996), modeling multidimensional groundwater flow (Clemo, 2007), adaptive multiscale parameterization of flow in unsaturated porous media (Hayek et al, 2008), transient groundwater flow in a bounded model domain (Lu & Vesselinov, 2015), fractured dual-porosity media (Delay et al, 2017;Fahs et al, 2014), and coupled surface water-groundwater modeling (RamaRao et al, 2017). However, few applications of the adjoint state method have been devoted to solute transport (e.g., Larbkich et al, 2014;Michalak & Kitanidis, 2004;Neupauer & Wilson, 1999, 2001Piasecki & Katopodes, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjoint state method offers an elegant and computationally efficient alternative to the parameter perturbation method and the sensitivity equation method. It has already been successfully applied in a broad range of fields including mathematical physics, electrical engineering, systems engineering, nuclear reactor assessment, hydrology, petroleum engineering, surface-water hydrology, meteorology, oceanography, and geophysics (Cacuci, 1981;Carrera & Neuman, 1986;Chavent et al, 1975;de Marsily et al, 1984;Delay et al, 2017Delay et al, , 2019Director & Rohrer, 1969;Hayek et al, 2008Hayek et al, , 2019Lavenue et al, 1989Lavenue et al, , 1995LaVenue & de Marsily, 2001;Losch & Heimbach, 2007;Lu & Vesselinov, 2015;Plessix, 2006;RamaRao et al, 1995;Sykes et al, 1985;Wilson & Metcalfe, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%