2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint-based error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement for the RANS and k–ω turbulence model equations

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this article we present the extension of the a posteriori error estimation and goaloriented mesh refinement approach from laminar to turbulent flows, which are governed by the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes and k-x turbulence model (RANS-kx) equations. In particular, we consider a discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the RANS-kx equations and use it within an adjoint-based error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement algorithm that targets the reduction of the discretization error in si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n el is set, aiming at obtaining a uniform error distribution in the whole domain, and minimizing possible pollution effects. Nevertheless, the stopping criterion for the adaptive procedure is based on checking the error only at the elements in the area of interest Ω int , see Equation (9).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Naca 0012 Aerodynamic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, n el is set, aiming at obtaining a uniform error distribution in the whole domain, and minimizing possible pollution effects. Nevertheless, the stopping criterion for the adaptive procedure is based on checking the error only at the elements in the area of interest Ω int , see Equation (9).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Naca 0012 Aerodynamic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of adaptive simulations in the field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been pointed out by various authors in the last years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Non-uniform discretizations, adapted to local flow features, are necessary to capture strong variations in the solution, shocks, sharp fronts or boundary layers, while keeping a coarser mesh where it is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme is of particular interest because (in some cases) it yields explicit time-step limits which are more than 2x larger than those of the collocation-based nodal DG scheme 18 . For this scheme, and for each set of nodal points, L2 errors in the energy E are shown in Table ( 6). In addition, contours of the density obtained with the α-optimized points for the case ofÑ = 8 and p = 3 are shown in Figure (9).…”
Section: B Flow Generated By a Time-dependent Source Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, high-order methods have been successfully employed to simulate flows over flapping wings 2,3 , rotorcraft 4 , turbine blades 5 , and high-lift devices 6 . Despite their success in these settings, they have yet to be adopted by a wide community of fluid-dynamicists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical values for this constant of proportionality are 2 to 3, with significantly lower values reported for highly nonlinear functions. 56,57 For the solver used in this work, the adjoint solution is typically found an order of magnitude faster than the flow solution.…”
Section: Va1 Validity Of Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%