2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to Silicone???Hydrogel Contact Lenses

Abstract: As a result of their hydrophobicity, the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A and balafilcon A) may carry higher risk of microbial contamination than both the hydrophilic daily wear silicone-hydrogel lens, galyfilcon A and the conventional hydrogel lens, etafilcon A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is consistent with other studies for other bacterial strains (Borazjani et al, 2004;Santos et al, 2008), it challenges the established relationship between microbial adhesion and lens surface hydrophobicity (Pritchard et al, 1999;Doyle, 2000;Young et al, 2002;van Oss, 2003;Giraldez et al, 2010b). This discrepancy could be explained by the different extents of microbial colonization observed for different bacterial strains, and/or the different methodologies employed (Henriques et al, 2005;Kodjikian et al, 2007). In fact, most P. aeruginosa strains have a more hydrophilic surface than S. epidermidis or other bacteria (Gottenbos et al, 2001;MitikDineva et al, 2009).…”
Section: Staphylococcus Epidermidissupporting
confidence: 29%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this is consistent with other studies for other bacterial strains (Borazjani et al, 2004;Santos et al, 2008), it challenges the established relationship between microbial adhesion and lens surface hydrophobicity (Pritchard et al, 1999;Doyle, 2000;Young et al, 2002;van Oss, 2003;Giraldez et al, 2010b). This discrepancy could be explained by the different extents of microbial colonization observed for different bacterial strains, and/or the different methodologies employed (Henriques et al, 2005;Kodjikian et al, 2007). In fact, most P. aeruginosa strains have a more hydrophilic surface than S. epidermidis or other bacteria (Gottenbos et al, 2001;MitikDineva et al, 2009).…”
Section: Staphylococcus Epidermidissupporting
confidence: 29%
“…Notwithstanding, Santos et al were unable to detect any difference in microbial adhesion when comparing unworn silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel CL. This discrepancy could be explained by the different extents of microbial colonization observed for different S. epidermidis strains, and/or the different methodologies employed (Henriques et al, 2005;Kodjikian et al, 2007). In both hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups, the lenses showing the lowest Ra values (omafilcon A and comfilcon A) also returned the lowest numbers of S. epidermidis CFU, despite their high Rku and Rsk values.…”
Section: Staphylococcus Epidermidismentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the end of the experiment, each well was washed twice with PBS to remove non-adherent or loosely adherent bacteria. After the last wash the pieces were removed from each well and immersed in a new microtiter plate with 1 ml of 98% (w/v) methanol in each well (Henriques et al, 2005). The methanol was discarded after 15 min of contact and the pieces were allowed to dry at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophobicity values of these isolates were not affected by the culture conditions, such as the culture medium and temperature, and no marked tendency was noted. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis are generally known to be very adhesive (Henriques et al, 2005), but it was clarifi ed that minor bacterial species with a hydrophobic cell surface layer, such as those isolated, were present. Adhesion is essential to many microorganisms, and adhesion to carriers may be signifi cant for biofi lm formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%