2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion-dependent rupturing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on biological antimicrobial nanostructured surfaces

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that some nanostructured surfaces (NSS), many of which are derived from surfaces found on insect cuticles, rupture and kill adhered prokaryotic microbes. Most important, the nanoscale topography is directly responsible for this effect. Although parameters such as cell adhesion and cell wall rigidity have been suggested to play significant roles in this process, there is little experimental evidence regarding the underlying mechanisms involving NSS-induced microbial rupture. In this wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
155
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 In follow-up studies, the nanopillars on the dragonfly wing were found to kill Gram-positive bacteria as well as yeast. 24,25 Similar nanopillars found on specially treated silicon wafers (black silicon) 26 had similar effects. According to these researchers, bacterial cells are killed on contact as they stretch over the pillars.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…22,23 In follow-up studies, the nanopillars on the dragonfly wing were found to kill Gram-positive bacteria as well as yeast. 24,25 Similar nanopillars found on specially treated silicon wafers (black silicon) 26 had similar effects. According to these researchers, bacterial cells are killed on contact as they stretch over the pillars.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In a mathematical model by Xue 27 explaining the mechanism of the bactericidal properties of the cicada wing, they suggest that when nanofeatures become sharper and the spacing between them is larger, the antibacterial properties of the surface are enhanced. Nowlin 28 also report that nanopillars with the smallest diameters were able to kill even the weakest adhering strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This supports the findings from percentage kill differences between the nanocone features on surfaces A and B.…”
Section: B Topographical Effect On Bacterial Adhesion and Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,22,[24][25][26]31,32,[34][35][36]38,[53][54][55][56][57] While the precise mechanism responsible for the antibacterial activity is still the subject of debate, 32,58 the consensus between the results obtained from both experimental [22][23][24][25][26]31,32,38,59,60 and theoretical 32,33 studies suggest that a torsional force is induced across the bacterial membrane upon surface adsorption.…”
Section: Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%