2019
DOI: 10.3390/lubricants7030020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion and Friction for Three Tire Tread Compounds

Abstract: We study the adhesion and friction for three tire tread rubber compounds. The adhesion study is for a smooth silica glass ball in contact with smooth sheets of the rubber in dry condition and in water. The friction studies are for rubber sliding on smooth glass, concrete, and asphalt road surfaces. We have performed the Leonardo da Vinci-type friction experiments and experiments using a linear friction tester. On the asphalt road, we also performed vehicle breaking distance measurements. The linear and non-lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we shall use in particular a simplified version for the viscoelastic losses, since they are no longer considered so relevant. Persson, indeed, in recent papers (Tolpekina & Persson,[14], see also [15]), seems to agree with Klüppel [10][11][12] (just looking at the how the friction data are separated into viscoelastic and adhesive contributions) that the contribution due to adhesion is now considered prevalent over the hysteretic one. Obviously, this shift is also a sign of the uncertainty of the choice on how to interpret the two contributions (viscoelastic and adhesive ones), which appear to have a similar bell-shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we shall use in particular a simplified version for the viscoelastic losses, since they are no longer considered so relevant. Persson, indeed, in recent papers (Tolpekina & Persson,[14], see also [15]), seems to agree with Klüppel [10][11][12] (just looking at the how the friction data are separated into viscoelastic and adhesive contributions) that the contribution due to adhesion is now considered prevalent over the hysteretic one. Obviously, this shift is also a sign of the uncertainty of the choice on how to interpret the two contributions (viscoelastic and adhesive ones), which appear to have a similar bell-shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In conclusion, the theories of rubber friction seem to have evolved over the years, but now the emphasis on the viscoelastic losses for tire-road contact due to fractal roughness has been much reduced, because the adhesive term is considered dominant. Persson's theories [4,[13][14][15] seem to have evolved more rigorously in the contact mechanics treatment (they are approximate, but the…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations