“…Using standardized methods for evaluation of study quality [24,25,27], the research team judged 18 of 51 (35.3%) of the studies pertaining to rates and correlates of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy to be high risk of bias, as noted in Tables 1 and 3.The most common factors that contributed to high risk of bias ratings included poor specification of target population and convenience sampling methods [16,39,43,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], small sample sizes [39, 58-61, 64, 65], lack of clear description of outcomes and/or inadequate measurement of adherence [16,31,39,56,66,67], and low response rate and/or lack of information on nonresponders [30,31,39,43,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][65][66][67], among other factors (supplemental online Appendix 2 provides full criteria and ratings). As shown in Table 2, the research team rated the majority of the intervention studies (58.3% [n 5 7 of 12]) to have high riskof bias, primarily because of use of single-group and nonrandomized study designs [42,46,…”