2010
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e11039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients with regular follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using standardized methods for evaluation of study quality [24,25,27], the research team judged 18 of 51 (35.3%) of the studies pertaining to rates and correlates of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy to be high risk of bias, as noted in Tables 1 and 3.The most common factors that contributed to high risk of bias ratings included poor specification of target population and convenience sampling methods [16,39,43,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], small sample sizes [39, 58-61, 64, 65], lack of clear description of outcomes and/or inadequate measurement of adherence [16,31,39,56,66,67], and low response rate and/or lack of information on nonresponders [30,31,39,43,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][65][66][67], among other factors (supplemental online Appendix 2 provides full criteria and ratings). As shown in Table 2, the research team rated the majority of the intervention studies (58.3% [n 5 7 of 12]) to have high riskof bias, primarily because of use of single-group and nonrandomized study designs [42,46,…”
Section: Evaluation Of Study Quality and Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using standardized methods for evaluation of study quality [24,25,27], the research team judged 18 of 51 (35.3%) of the studies pertaining to rates and correlates of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy to be high risk of bias, as noted in Tables 1 and 3.The most common factors that contributed to high risk of bias ratings included poor specification of target population and convenience sampling methods [16,39,43,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], small sample sizes [39, 58-61, 64, 65], lack of clear description of outcomes and/or inadequate measurement of adherence [16,31,39,56,66,67], and low response rate and/or lack of information on nonresponders [30,31,39,43,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][65][66][67], among other factors (supplemental online Appendix 2 provides full criteria and ratings). As shown in Table 2, the research team rated the majority of the intervention studies (58.3% [n 5 7 of 12]) to have high riskof bias, primarily because of use of single-group and nonrandomized study designs [42,46,…”
Section: Evaluation Of Study Quality and Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80%), and those who reported missing $ 3 days in the last 2 weeks were considered nonadherent (, 80%). 7 Women who were nonadherent or who discontinued treatment were grouped as nonadherent for analyses.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] ET is a highly effective adjuvant treatment associated with a 40% reduction in BC recurrence and 30% reduction in BCrelated mortality. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite its clinical benefits, 10% to 30%…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sociodemographic characteristics -age at diagnosis (until 40 years old; 50-69 years old; 70 years old or older) 18 ; educational level in years of complete studies (low, ; comorbidities described in medical record (yes or no); family history of cancer; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 21 (attributing two points in the report of only one neoplasm, and three points, four or more according to the quantity of self-reported comorbidities); 3. support characteristics -kind of hormonal therapy (TMX or anastrozole); performance of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery; number of appointments in clinical oncology (up to 13 appointments and 14 or more) 6 ; number of hospitalizations during the observation period (none; up to 2; 3 or more) 19 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%