Adherence of healthcare professionals to American Diabetes Association 2004 guidelines for the care of patients with type 2 diabetes at peripheral diabetes clinics in Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract

Objective: To observe the adherence of Healthcare Professionals to American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2004 guidelines for the care of patients with type 2 diabetes at Peripheral Diabetes Clinics (PDCs) in Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: The study was conducted using a retrospective medical chart review of patients with type 2 diabetes at four PDCs in four townships of Karachi district from January 2005 to December 2006. Entire medical records of patients were evaluated for the evidence of documentation of testing and treatment. Results: Medical records of 691 patients (332 males and 359 females) with type 2 diabetes were reviewed. Mean age of the patients was 50.79 ± 10.75 years. Deficiencies were observed in most areas of diabetes care. Blood pressure was documented in 85.81% patients, whereas, serum creatinine, HbA1c and lipid profile were noted in 56%, 44.57% and 40.08% of the patients respectively. Similarly, lower leg examination was registered in 44% patients, while in 30.53% of the patients fundoscopic examination was recorded. Co-morbid conditions like hypertension and hyperlipidemia were documented in 92.7% and 84.6% patients respectively. HbA1c < 7% was achieved by 59.04% patients, while 27.50% of the patients attained the recommended level of serum cholesterol. Likewise, ADA recommended goal for blood pressure and LDL was achieved by13.02% and 12.16% patients respectively. Conclusions: The study showed that adherence of healthcare professionals to ADA guidelines was suboptimal. Moreover, insufficient documentation of medical records reflected inadequate care of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Factors Associated with Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of a Spanish Delphi Consensus

“…It has been clearly shown that the use of guidelines is associated with better prognosis, achieving target goals for HbA1c, blood pressure, renal function, and lipid profiles, as well as greater patient's satisfaction than when they are not used [ 12 – 14 ]. However, the adherence of healthcare professionals to recommendations of CPGs is unsatisfactory, with deficiencies in most areas of diabetes care and follow-up [ 15 – 19 ]. Barriers reported include lack of awareness, familiarity or agreement with the content, poor understanding of the need for change to overcome the inertia of normal practice, differences in the goals between clinicians and patients, and a number of external constraints associated with deficiencies in equipment and space, shortage of time, staff, and financial resources [ 20 – 23 ].…”

Evidence-based early stage type 2 diabetes follow-up in Belgian primary care practices: Impact of multi-professional teams and care protocols

“…Only 42% underwent the recommended foot examination and only 20% got lifestyle recommendations [9]. A Pakistani study in 2005 revealed that only 30% of the diabetics got an eye examination, and HbA1c levels were recorded for only 44% of the included diabetics [10]. Another American study revealed that only 7% of 42 837 people diagnosed with DMT2 were monitored entirely correctly for HbA1c, according to ADA guidelines, for one year [11].…”

Interventional study to improve diabetic guidelines adherence using mobile health (m-Health) technology in Lahore, Pakistan

“…Haemoglobin A1c levels were recorded in 44% of the patients and fasting blood sugar was checked in 50%. 3 Another study done in Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan, in 2012–2013 checked the diabetic preventive care recommendations by physicians. The results revealed that 39% of the patients had not been properly counselled about required lifestyle changes, and that 68% had not received information on prevention of diabetic complications.…”

“… 7 8 There is a lack of national diabetic guidelines and standardised evidence-based care in Pakistan. 3 4 In a study done in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, only 7% of the physicians were following diabetic guidelines completely. 9…”