2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0282-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence in outpatients taking warfarin and its effect on anticoagulation control in Jordan

Abstract: Background Medication adherence is an important element for the success of any therapeutic plan. The picture is more complicated with warfarin, due to its small therapeutic window and patients' needs to have effective anticoagulation control. Objective To measure warfarin-adherence, warfarin-knowledge and to assess the relationship between adherence and anticoagulation control. Setting Adult outpatients (≥18 years) taking warfarin at two medical sites in north of Jordan were invited to participate. Method This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we also examined the relationships between warfarin adherence and WRKT and BMQ scores. Our findings demonstrated that the proportion of patients being adherent based on their scores in the questionnaires was 67.7%, relatively higher than that reported previously in a Jordanian survey 21 which showed an adherence rate of 46%. A study performed in Singapore using MMAS-8 to examine warfarin adherence reported a high adherence rate of 34.5% (score =8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In the present study, we also examined the relationships between warfarin adherence and WRKT and BMQ scores. Our findings demonstrated that the proportion of patients being adherent based on their scores in the questionnaires was 67.7%, relatively higher than that reported previously in a Jordanian survey 21 which showed an adherence rate of 46%. A study performed in Singapore using MMAS-8 to examine warfarin adherence reported a high adherence rate of 34.5% (score =8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Conversely, Kim et al [38] found that only 27% of patients were adherent to treatment and had INR control although they did not use the MMAS-8 to assess warfarin adherence. However, in another study that was conducted in Jordan by Ababneh et al [64], 25 subjects (10.6%) were adherent to warfarin anticoagulation and had good anticoagulation control, using TTR >70/MMAS score of 8 as the adherence parameter, which is lower than in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparatively, other researchers have reported a higher percentage (57.8%) using the same scale (Naderiravesh et al, 2015). Previous research strongly links adherence with the patient’s warfarin knowledge (Ababneh et al, 2016). Providing educational interventions focused on the need to commit to warfarin therapy and reducing patient concerns about the side effects can significantly improve patient adherence (Clarkesmith et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%