2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenosine (A)2A receptor modulation of nicotine-induced locomotor sensitization. A pharmacological and transgenic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that spontaneous glutamate efflux was not different in the two genotypes, in agreement with a recent article which demonstrated that basal tissue glutamate levels were not different in the striatum of NSEA 2A animals with respect to control rats (Jastrzębska et al . ). On the contrary, K + ‐induced glutamate outflow was (i) significantly increased in NSEA 2A with respect to WT rats; (ii) increased by CGS 21680, with a significantly higher effect in NSEA 2A than in WT rats; (iii) reduced by ZM 241385 in NSEA 2A but not in WT rats; (iv) reduced by WIN, with a significantly lower effect in NSEA 2A than in WT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was found that spontaneous glutamate efflux was not different in the two genotypes, in agreement with a recent article which demonstrated that basal tissue glutamate levels were not different in the striatum of NSEA 2A animals with respect to control rats (Jastrzębska et al . ). On the contrary, K + ‐induced glutamate outflow was (i) significantly increased in NSEA 2A with respect to WT rats; (ii) increased by CGS 21680, with a significantly higher effect in NSEA 2A than in WT rats; (iii) reduced by ZM 241385 in NSEA 2A but not in WT rats; (iv) reduced by WIN, with a significantly lower effect in NSEA 2A than in WT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, when cue-signaled reinforcement was predictable during the 5-CSRTT, ZM-241385 did not induce impulsive sign-tracking responses. It is possible that inhibition of the A 2A R, which includes the effects of caffeine, may mediate increases in locomotion, 40, 60, 61 which when in combination with reward/reinforcement unpredictability, leads to compounded exploratory activity and exacerbations in impulsive reward-seeking behavior. Therefore, we posit that dysfunctional adenosinergic regulation can exacerbate the inherent cognitive dissonance between the drive for reward gratification and a reward, which may or may not be available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2A R, belonging to Family A GPCRs, are widely expressed in the CNS including striatum, hippocampus, and cortex and play essential roles in the regulation of locomotion, sleep, anxiety, memory, and cognition [16, 17]. Recently, A 2A R has emerged as a non-dopaminergic target for the treatment of PD, owing to its physical and functional interaction with dopamine D 2 receptor in striato-pallidal GABA pathway [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%