Addressing Transparency, Communication and Participation in Enterprise 2.0 Projects

Nedbal, Dietmar; Auinger, Andreas; Hochmeier, Alexander

doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.075

Cited by 13 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other domains. Participation, transparency, and communication between employees at two different companies were examined to understand the impacts on cooperation and trust (Nedbal et al, 2013). Different communication mechanisms, such as blogs and wikis, improved the intraorganizational information transparency.…”

Section: Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other transparency definitions, across domains, describe transparency as the communication of information regarding the machine’s abilities (Mercado et al, 2016) and capabilities (Wohleber, Stowers, Chen, & Barnes, 2017). Transparency has been described as a process (Nedbal, Auinger, & Hochmeier, 2013), method (Lyons, Sadler, et al, 2017; Selkowitz, Lakhmani, Larios, & Chen, 2016), mechanism (Lyons, 2013; Theodorou, Wortham, & Bryson, 2017), property (Selkowitz, Lakhmani, Chen, & Boyce, 2015), or emergent characteristic (Ososky, Sanders, Jentsch, Hancock, & Chen, 2014) that provides information or explanations (Kim & Hinds, 2006) to a human operator to develop accurate mental models of the system. The type of information provided, known as information transparency (Bruni, Marquez, Brzezinski, Nehme, & Boussemart, 2007), includes what (Mark & Kobsa, 2005) the human operator or machine is doing (Lyons, 2013) and why a particular task is being conducted (Sanders, Wixon, Schafer, Chen, & Hancock, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Transparency: Transitioning From Human–Machine Systems to Human-Swarm Systems

Roundtree

Goodrich

Adams

2019

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Swarm robotic systems are gaining in interest with the prospect of their use for various applications, including monitoring, tracking, infrastructure support, and protection. Prior human-swarm system research investigated transparency for these systems, but assumed perfect communication scenarios. Real-world human-swarm systems will not have perfect communication due to human processing limitations caused by a large number of individual entities, emergent behavior due to varying environments, and bandwidth issues. Factors that affect transparency or are influenced by transparency were identified from various human–machine system domains; however, understanding the relationship between factors can help designers identify what criteria can be implemented to achieve transparency for swarms. Challenges that may arise based on transparency criteria from human–machine systems are examined to identify improvements for spatial swarm systems.

show abstract

Section: Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transparency: Transitioning From Human–Machine Systems to Human-Swarm Systems

Roundtree

Goodrich

Adams

2019

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the assessment of scenarios of digitized work, the influence on agility is therefore significant. For this criterion, the factors customer orientation and participation, transparency, breaking up disciplinary boundaries and decentralisation of decision making have been identified as measurable indicators for agile projects [60].…”

Section: Classification and Rating Of The Organizational Dimensionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Change Management Instrument for the Implementation of Technologies

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The manufacturing industry is increasingly being dominated by information and communication technology, leading to the development of cyber-physical systems. Most existing frameworks on the assessment of such technological advancements see the technology as a solitary system. However, research has shown that other environmental factors like organizational processes or human factors are also affected. Drawing on the sociotechnical systems approach, future technologies could be evaluated using scenarios of digitized work. These scenarios can help classify new technologies and uncover their advantages and constraints in order to provide guidance for the digital development of organizations. We developed an instrument for evaluating scenarios of digitized work on the relevant dimensions ‘technology’, ‘human’ and ‘organization’ and conducted a quantitative study applying this instrument on three different scenarios (N = 24 subject matter experts). Results show that our instrument is capable of measuring technological, human and organizational aspects of technology implementations and detecting differences in the scenarios under investigation. The instrument’s practical value is significant as it enables the user to compare and quantify scenarios and helps companies to decide which technology they should implement.

show abstract

“…The answer on the basic question "What are the key methods in project management of Enterprise 2.0 platform?" is given by the authors [17] as a list of 9 implemented tools. Question itself and the answers show a high importance related to transparency in projects of Enterprise 2.0 platform.…”

Section: Case 4 [17]mentioning

confidence: 99%

Transparency in Project Management – from Traditional to Agile

Betta¹,

Baliasov²

2018

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article provides a comparative analysis of the transparency phenomenon in different project management methodologies. The key issues of the study are: understanding of transparency in different theoretical paradigms, universal and specific characteristics of transparency, models and types of transparency depending on the type of project, scope of implementation, the regime of accountability, sources of funding, methodology of project management. The research analysis was carried out using the methods of document analysis, secondary data analysis, data integration, benchmarking and case-method. It's has been established that transparency is a necessary condition and tool for project stakeholders' relationship management. The dynamics of the development of the theory and practice of project management-from the classical project management (Project management body of knowledge PMBOK) to the family of flexible iterative-incremental methods of project and product management (Agile) changes the modality of transparency and the processes of its operationalization in the logic of possible and mandatory.

show abstract

Addressing Transparency, Communication and Participation in Enterprise 2.0 Projects

Cited by 13 publications

References 17 publications

Transparency: Transitioning From Human–Machine Systems to Human-Swarm Systems

Transparency: Transitioning From Human–Machine Systems to Human-Swarm Systems

Development of a Change Management Instrument for the Implementation of Technologies

Transparency in Project Management – from Traditional to Agile

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About