Addressing the Directionality Challenge through RSSI-Based Multilateration Technique, to Localize Nodes in Underwater WSNs by Using Magneto-Inductive Communication

Abstract

The deployment and efficient use of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in underwater and underground environments persists to be a difficult task. In addition, the localization of a sensor Rx node in WSNs is an important aspect for the successful communication with the aforementioned environments. To overcome the limitations of electromagnetic, acoustic, and optical communication in underwater and underground wireless sensor networks (UWSNs), magneto-inductive (MI) communication technology emerged as a promising alternative for usage in UWSNs with a wide range of applications. To make the magneto-inductive underwater wireless sensor networks (MI-UWSNs) more efficient, recently, various research studies focused on the optimization of the physical layer, MAC layer, and routing layer, but none of them has taken into account the effect of directionality. Despite the directionality issue posed by the physical nature of a magnetic field, the unique qualities of MI communication open up a gateway for several applications. The directionality issue of MI sensors is a critical challenge that must be taken into account while developing any WSN protocol or localization algorithm. This paper highlights and discusses the severity and impact of the directionality issue in designing a localization algorithm for magneto-inductive wireless sensor networks (MI-WSNs). A received signal strength indicator (RSSI)-based multilateration localization algorithm is presented in this paper, where a minimum of 2 and maximum of 10 anchor Tx nodes are used to estimate the position of the sensor Rx nodes, which are deployed randomly in a 15 m × 15 m simulation environment. This RSSI-based multilateration technique is the most suitable option that can be used to quantify the impact of directionality on the localization of a sensor Rx node.

Trustworthy Localization in IoT Networks: A Survey of Localization Techniques, Threats, and Mitigation

“…Tested in different scenarios, both outdoor and indoor, these studies demonstrate the promising potential of LoRa technology in terms of position estimation accuracy and robustness to various forms of interference. Exploring intricate and futuristic IoT scenarios, the authors of [57] address the challenges of WSNs in underwater and underground environments. They emphasize the importance of addressing the directionality issues associated with these localization approaches in such scenarios.…”

A Maximum Localization Rate Algorithm for 3D Large-Scale UWSNs

“…make up the regular tetrahedron are found (as shown in Fig. 5(a)), and the coordinates of the unknown node will be estimated by the formula (3)- (8). If the four neighbor anchor nodes that constitute the regular tetrahedron cannot be found after traversing all kinds of the C 4 K possibilities (as shown in Fig.…”

“…5(b)), the unknown node will be located using the traditional method. Namely, all K anchor nodes are used to estimate the coordinates of unknown nodes according to the formula (3)- (8).…”

“…Distance estimation algorithms can be categorized into rangebased and range-free depending on whether the distance value needs to be measured. Range-based localization methods that are frequently employed include Time of Arrival (TOA) [3], [4], Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) [5], [6], Angle of Arrival (AOA) [5], [7], and Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) [8], [9], while range-free algorithms include Centroid Algorithm [10], Distance Vector-Hop (DV-Hop) [11], [12], and Approximate Point-In-Triangulation Test (APIT) [13], etc.…”

Robust Positioning Estimation for Underwater Acoustics Targets with Use of Multi-Particle Swarm Optimization

“…With the continuous improvement of land resource mining technology, people are gradually turning to more abundant marine resources [1]. For marine resource exploration, data are meaningless without knowing the location of underwater targets.…”