1988
DOI: 10.1016/0887-6185(88)90007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing misconceptions about phobia, anxiety, and self-efficacy: A reply to Marks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as emphasized in the introduction, each of the dependent variables in this study is of interest in its own right, and the measures taken together are not conceived as multiple measures of "agoraphobia." The primary dimension of agoraphobia is behavioral disability (Williams, 1985(Williams, , 1987(Williams, , 1988, which is measured here by the behavioral approach tests. Each remaining dependent variable measures a specific psychological factor proposed to explain agoraphobia, and in addition to correlational analyses, it is appropriate to view the effect of the independent variable on each remaining dependent variable separately.…”
Section: Generalization Across Phobiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, as emphasized in the introduction, each of the dependent variables in this study is of interest in its own right, and the measures taken together are not conceived as multiple measures of "agoraphobia." The primary dimension of agoraphobia is behavioral disability (Williams, 1985(Williams, , 1987(Williams, , 1988, which is measured here by the behavioral approach tests. Each remaining dependent variable measures a specific psychological factor proposed to explain agoraphobia, and in addition to correlational analyses, it is appropriate to view the effect of the independent variable on each remaining dependent variable separately.…”
Section: Generalization Across Phobiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each remaining dependent variable measures a specific psychological factor proposed to explain agoraphobia, and in addition to correlational analyses, it is appropriate to view the effect of the independent variable on each remaining dependent variable separately. (For additional discussion of these points, see Williams, 1985Williams, , 1987Williams, , 1988 The second motivation for employing MAN-OVAs is to control experiment-wise Type I error rates (Cliff, 1987), which is not a concern here given the heavy preponderance of significant findings obtained. However, it is appropriate to control family-wise error rate by adjusting for the three intergroup comparisons for each variable in Treatment Phase 1.…”
Section: Generalization Across Phobiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations