2001
DOI: 10.1190/1.1438988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing anisotropy in 3-D prestack depth migration: A case study from the Southern North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest challenge was related to the fact that we already know from the surface seismic survey that this geological medium has very low anisotropy strength, and estimated anisotropy parameters were very low; however, these parameters have a significant impact on seismic processing and migration. This accurate information about local anisotropy could improve reprocessing of seismic data in the future, especially model building for depth migration [6]. The obtained results showed that combining the advanced processing of challenging walkaway VSP data with detailed data analysis of P-wave-only inversion gives additional helpful reservoir information that can be used to make interpretation more accurate when other surveys produce poor quality results and even if anisotropy is relatively low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The biggest challenge was related to the fact that we already know from the surface seismic survey that this geological medium has very low anisotropy strength, and estimated anisotropy parameters were very low; however, these parameters have a significant impact on seismic processing and migration. This accurate information about local anisotropy could improve reprocessing of seismic data in the future, especially model building for depth migration [6]. The obtained results showed that combining the advanced processing of challenging walkaway VSP data with detailed data analysis of P-wave-only inversion gives additional helpful reservoir information that can be used to make interpretation more accurate when other surveys produce poor quality results and even if anisotropy is relatively low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The accuracy of transverse anisotropy parameters determines the accuracy of depth matching of seismic data with well information. The difference between horizontal and vertical velocities can be determined better with long offsets, although walkaway VSP information and other well data would be helpful or even mandatory as well (Hawkins et al, 2001;Hawkins et al, 2002;Robein, 2010).…”
Section: Determine Maximum Offsetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Secondly, we estimate the effective Thomsen's (1986) parameter 5 from the mismatches between effective P-wave velocities derived from surface seismic data after signal enhancement and compressional sonic logs after upscaling. Since the lack of structure permitted the assumption of a vertical axis of symmetry (VTI), we incorporate the following velocity matching formula (Hawkins et al, 2001)…”
Section: Velocity Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dix inversion formula then transformed the stacking velocity into the reference 'sediment only' velocity perturbation AV(x,t). To reduce uncertainties of the reference isotropic model (Hawkins et al, 2001;Jones, 2003;Lambare et a l , 2007), we estimated the effective parameter 6 using eq. (1).…”
Section: Prestack Time Migration and Initial Velocity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%