2012
DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560803041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Seismic Survey Design, Second edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 341 publications
(658 reference statements)
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When designing a survey or assessing a given acquisition geometry, common midpoint‐based attributes such as fold and sampling at different offset as well as azimuth ranges are widely used, as illustrated in Cordsen, Galbraith and Peirce () and Vermeer (). Although they can quickly provide beneficial information on the anticipated data quality from a given acquisition geometry, these attributes inherently disregard the effect of processing.…”
Section: Survey Design With Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing a survey or assessing a given acquisition geometry, common midpoint‐based attributes such as fold and sampling at different offset as well as azimuth ranges are widely used, as illustrated in Cordsen, Galbraith and Peirce () and Vermeer (). Although they can quickly provide beneficial information on the anticipated data quality from a given acquisition geometry, these attributes inherently disregard the effect of processing.…”
Section: Survey Design With Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For surface‐wave analysis and inversion, the use of 3D geometries is not a limitation. Cross‐spread geometry (Vermeer ) is widely used in 3D land seismic surveying and provides a complete sampling of the surface‐wave propagation also in the offset and azimuth and a large statistical redundancy for the surface‐wave analysis (compare Fig. ).…”
Section: Surface‐wave Acquisition and Multiscale Analysis With Point‐mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the station spacing is greater than the Nyquist sampling interval, the data will not adequately define steeply dipping reflectors or hyperbola diffraction tails. In areas of flat‐lying reflectors, this criterion can be compromised (Vermeer, 2002).…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%