2022
DOI: 10.21935/tls.v1i2.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive manufacturing of capacitive humidity sensors by screen printing for condition monitoring of FRP composites

Abstract: Screen printing as a method of additive manufacturing applicable for the production of highly sensitive humidity sensors is presented. For this purpose, manufacturing, benchmarking and optimization of sensitive micro-composite dielectric paste systems suitable for screen printing are demonstrated. Furthermore, commercially available silver paste systems were rheologically and electrically characterized and benchmarked. Thereby bulk silver conductivities of up to 15 % were measured with average layer thicknesse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil humidity data is anomalous when compared to the other parameters, as it does not show the expected daily variation [86]. Air temperature and light intensity data both exhibit typical diurnal cycles, indicating that these sensors are likely functioning correctly and that they are capturing the expected natural variations in environmental conditions [87] [88]. The consistent readings across both (BAU) and (LC) for all parameters suggest that the conditions or locations for these measurements are experiencing similar environmental factors or that they are part of a controlled experiment with uniform conditions [89].…”
Section: Functional Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The soil humidity data is anomalous when compared to the other parameters, as it does not show the expected daily variation [86]. Air temperature and light intensity data both exhibit typical diurnal cycles, indicating that these sensors are likely functioning correctly and that they are capturing the expected natural variations in environmental conditions [87] [88]. The consistent readings across both (BAU) and (LC) for all parameters suggest that the conditions or locations for these measurements are experiencing similar environmental factors or that they are part of a controlled experiment with uniform conditions [89].…”
Section: Functional Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%