Additive genetic parameter estimates for heifer pregnancy and subsequent reproduction in Angus females.

Abstract

A primary objective of this study was to determine whether the binary traits heifer pregnancy (HP) and subsequent rebreeding (SR) were heritable in an experimental population of Angus cattle. A second objective was to determine the nature of the additive genetic relationships among HP, SR, and stayability (S(5/1)) in the same population. Heifer pregnancy was defined as the observation of a heifer conceiving and remaining pregnant to palpation at 120 d, given exposure during the breeding season. Subsequent rebreeding was defined as the observation of a 2-yr-old conceiving and remaining pregnant to palpation at 105 d, given pregnancy as a yearling and exposure during the breeding season. Stayability was defined as the probability of a female having at least five calves, given she becomes a dam as a 2 yr old. Data were analyzed using a maximum a posteriori probit threshold model to predict breeding values on the liability scale and Method R procedures to estimate variance components in the determination of heritability (h2). Additive genetic groups were used in determining the additive genetic relationships among these fertility traits. Additive genetic groups were formed on one trait's breeding values and used in the prediction of another trait's breeding values. Analyses yielded h2 estimates that were out of the parameter space 8.5 and 46.3% for HP and SR, respectively, and 5.9% for the reestimation of S(5/1). The majority of point estimates outside the parameter space for SR converged toward 0, whereas those for HP and S(5/1) primarily converged toward 1. From the subsamples producing h2 estimates within the parameter space, average h2 for HP, SR, and S(5/1) were .21, .19, and .15, with standard deviations of .12, .14, and .08, respectively. The estimates of h2 indicate that HP and S(5/1) were heritable and should respond favorably to selection; however, SR did not appear heritable due to the large number of subsamples producing h2 estimates out of the parameter space. Fixed effect estimates for age of dam were significant for HP. From the analyses using additive genetic groups, the relationship among HP and S(5/1) appeared to be nonlinear. This potential nonlinear relationship seen between HP and S(5/1) indicates that selection for improved female fertility would be most effective by having predictions on both traits.

Non-linear model analysis of categorical traits related to female reproduction efficiency in beef cattle

“…Using Method R to analyse fertility traits in Bos indicus beef cattle, Evans et al (1999), Doyle et al (2000) and Eler et al (2004) estimated heritabilities of similar magnitude to those estimated in this study.…”

“…A lower sire variance of 0.072 for STAY was estimated with the heritability estimated on the underlying scale as 0.27. This estimate is higher than the heritablities estimated for STAY by Snelling et al (1995) 0.09 and 0.20; Doyle et al (2000) of 0.15; Van der Westhuizen et al (2001) which ranged between 0.03 and 0.08 and Silva et al (2003) with heritabilities ranging 0.11 to 0.17 for Nelore cattle. However, it corresponds to heritability estimates using threshold models by Martinez et al (2002) on Hereford cattle ranging from 0.13 to 0.49.…”

Efeito da seleção para crescimento na permanência de vacas Nelore no rebanho até cinco anos de idade

“…Doyle et al (2000) obtiveram herdabilidade de 0,15 com intervalo de confiança de 0,04 a 0,30 para a habilidade de vacas da raça Angus ter cinco crias dado que ela teve uma cria aos dois Rebanho N 1 CGER 2 Peso à seleção (kg) P5|S (% de sucesso)…”

Genetic variability in calving success in Aberdeen Angus cows under extensive recording

“…In beef cattle, focus has been on calving date (Bourdon and Brinks, 1983;Buddenberg et al, 1990), or the related calving day (Ponzoni, 1992) or days to calving (Meyer et al, 1990;Johnston and Bunter, 1996;Donoghue et al, 2004a). Recently, heifer pregnancy status and the outcome of subsequent rebreeding have attracted interest (Evans et al, 1999;Doyle et al, 2000;Eler et al, 2004). Calving success (CS) has been studied as well (Meyer et al, 1990;Mercadante et al, 2003;Donoghue et al, 2004d).…”