1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf03055169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional measurements of the radiative capture cross sections for 3 MeV neutrons

Abstract: The cross-sections for e3Cu, 74Ge, 75As, s~ SlBr, I3~ mPr, lssW, ~176 7) reactions have been measured at 3 MeV. The results are in agreement with earlier measurements and follow the general trend observed in the radiative capture cross-sections for fast neutrons. In the case of Ge, Se and.Pr the isomeric cross-section ratios were also caleulated on the basis of the HUIZENCA--VANVENBOSVr method. From a comparison of the caleulated and measured isomeric ratios the probable value of the spin cut-off parameter and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for the 63 Cu(n,γ) 64 Cu cross section are plotted in Fig. 5 in comparison to the previously existing data [14][15][16][17][18][19] instead of the more recent IRDFF [21] evaluation. As can be seen, our data agree well with the existing data in the 0.4 to 3 MeV energy range.…”
Section: Data-analysis Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our results for the 63 Cu(n,γ) 64 Cu cross section are plotted in Fig. 5 in comparison to the previously existing data [14][15][16][17][18][19] instead of the more recent IRDFF [21] evaluation. As can be seen, our data agree well with the existing data in the 0.4 to 3 MeV energy range.…”
Section: Data-analysis Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The agreement between the experimental data reported by Sudar and Csikai (1979) [26], and BSFGM predictions is generally good for this reaction. On the other hand, the measured cross section data of Qaim et al (1982) [27] Bahal and Pepelnik (1985) [28], Qaim (1974) [29] and Diksic et al (1974) [30]. The structure of the obtained excitation functions by the GDH and the two-component exciton models are different from each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%