2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-016-3327-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive tracking control for a class of nonlinear non-strict-feedback systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1: Despite some efforts such as [27] and [35] have been made to relax the boundedness assumption of control gain functions, the considered works have limited application because they consider ideal control gain functions not perturbed by any disturbance term.…”
Section: A Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 1: Despite some efforts such as [27] and [35] have been made to relax the boundedness assumption of control gain functions, the considered works have limited application because they consider ideal control gain functions not perturbed by any disturbance term.…”
Section: A Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1: Consider the strict-feedback nonlinear system described by (1) with Assumptions 1-2. Consider the intermediate virtual control laws (18), (34), the actual control law (54), and the adaptive laws (19), (20), (35), (36), (55), and (56). For any ξ > 0, and bounded initial conditions satisfyinĝ ψ i (0) ≥ 0,Ξ i (0) ≥ 0 and V (0) ≤ ξ with ξ being any given positive constant, there exist design parameters c i , σ i , υ i , and τ i such that: i) The compact set Ω n × Ω 0 × Ω θ is an invariant set, namely, V (t) ≤ ξ for ∀t > 0, and hence all the signals in the closed-loop system are semi-globally uniformly ultimately bounded (SGUUB); ii) The output tracking error z 1 satisfies lim t→∞ |z 1 | ≤ √ 2Σ, where Σ > 0 is a constant that can be made arbitrarily small by properly selecting the design parameters.…”
Section: Consider the Quadratic Lyapunov Function Candidatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effectively relaxes the a priori boundedness assumption. Despite some other techniques available to relax this assumption [22,23], the case has limited application in practice if the prescribed performance constraint and input saturation constraint are not taken into account. This complicates the control design of nonlinear systems due to the couplings between the output and input constraints.…”
Section: Assumption 1 the Reference Signal Is A Sufficiently Smooth mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSC technique has allowed scholars to construct approximation-based adaptive control schemes for many nonlinear strict-feedback and nonstrict-feedback systems [16][17][18][19][20][21]; however, these control schemes are all based on the assumption that the control gain functions must be bounded. To relax this restrictive hypothesis, two adaptive NNs control schemes were developed for strict-feedback and nonstrictfeedback systems by assuming that control gain functions are continuous and are bounded on a compact set [22,23]. However, these schemes do not consider the simultaneous occurrence of prescribed performance and input saturation constraints due to inherent difficulties in the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last several decades, adaptive control techniques have been found to be powerful for controlling the trianglestructural nonlinear systems in terms of either pure-feedback or strict-feedback [1]- [17]. Specifically, pure-feedback systems do not have the explicit control input, which makes the control design very difficult and draws much interest in the control community for a long time [8]- [17]. In [10], to solve the prescribed performance tracking control problem, a low-complexity control scheme is designed for a class of unknown pure-feedback systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%