1968
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1968.1098903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive step size random search

Abstract: Absiraci-Fixed step size random search for minimization of functions of several parameters is described and compared with the k e d step size gradient method for a particular surface. A theoretical technique, using the optimum step size at each step, is analyzed. A practical adaptive step size random search algorithm is then proposed, and experimental experience is reported that shows the superiority of random search over other methods for sufllciently high dimension.T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
3

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Creeping random methods have been studied by Korn and Korn (1964), Rastrigin (1967), and Belcey and Karplus (1968). Schumer and Steiglitz (1968) provided additional information on adaptive step size random searches.…”
Section: Methods Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creeping random methods have been studied by Korn and Korn (1964), Rastrigin (1967), and Belcey and Karplus (1968). Schumer and Steiglitz (1968) provided additional information on adaptive step size random searches.…”
Section: Methods Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The λ offspring are evaluated (line 2 with B = I the identity matrix). Depending on the choice of the step-size adaptation rule, the step-size is then adapted, either by some rule similar to the one-fifth rule [13,11] (line 4), or using the Cumulative Stepsize Adaptation [6] (line 6). CMA-ES differs from standard ES on lines 2 and 7, that describe the use of the Adaptive Encoding procedure.…”
Section: Adaptive Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty argument has the defect that it may yield fictitious solutions when the problem is ill-posed. More discussion on this subject has been given by Beltrami (1970 Gurin (1966), Schumer and Steiglitz (1968), Zakharev (1969) and Hill (1969). Good survey papers on random search methods were also given by Karnopp (1963) and White (1972).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%