1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1110(96)90034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive response to ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes: the problem of scoring aberrations in cells irradiated during asynchronous growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e method of sequential harvesting, also known as the multiple fi xation regimen, was recommended to obtain a meaningful frequency of chromosomal aberrations in cells irradiated during asynchronous growth (Kaufman et al 1974, Savage andPapworth 1991). Th e underlying principle of this method is that it allows identifying increased or reduced levels of cytogenetic damage as being caused by transient shifts of the cell cycle if they are not observed in all samples harvested sequentially (Wojcik et al 1996). Indeed, the results of our sequential harvesting experiments clearly show that the TE observed in TK6 cells after a harvesting time of 27 h was not seen at later harvesting times (Dang et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e method of sequential harvesting, also known as the multiple fi xation regimen, was recommended to obtain a meaningful frequency of chromosomal aberrations in cells irradiated during asynchronous growth (Kaufman et al 1974, Savage andPapworth 1991). Th e underlying principle of this method is that it allows identifying increased or reduced levels of cytogenetic damage as being caused by transient shifts of the cell cycle if they are not observed in all samples harvested sequentially (Wojcik et al 1996). Indeed, the results of our sequential harvesting experiments clearly show that the TE observed in TK6 cells after a harvesting time of 27 h was not seen at later harvesting times (Dang et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major problem is that cells progress through the cell cycle with variable speed, hence a simple relationship between the time of treatment plus the adding of colcemid and the phase of the cell cycle during which the treatment occurred is not possible. Nevertheless, when aberrations are analyzed on a series of slides prepared after increasing times post treatment, the mean yield of chromatid aberration declines with post-treatment time [ 21 23 ]. This result is interpreted as a reflection of the increasing radiosensitivity of cells as they progress from S-phase towards mitosis [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%