Adaptive real-time closed-loop temperature control for ultrasound hyperthermia using magnetic resonance thermometry

Abstract

Previous researchers have successfully demonstrated the application of temperature feedback control for thermal treatment of disease using MR thermometry. Using the temperature-dependent proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift, ultrasound heating for hyperthermia to a target organ (such as the prostate) can be tightly controlled. However, using fixed gain controllers, the response of the target to ultrasound heating varies with type, size, location, shape, stage of growth, and proximity to other vulnerable organs. To adjust for clinical variables, feedback self-tuning regulator (STR) and model reference adaptive control (MRAC) methods have been designed and implemented using real-time, online MR thermometry by adjusting the output power to an ultrasound array to quickly reach the hyperthermia target temperatures. The use of fast adaptive controllers in this application is advantageous because adaptive controllers do not require a priori knowledge of the initial tissue properties and blood perfusion and can quickly reach the steady-state target temperature in the presence of dynamic tissue properties (e.g., thermal conductivity, blood perfusion). This research was conducted to rapidly achieve and manage therapeutic temperatures from an ultrasound array using novel MRI-guided adaptive closed-loop controllers both in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. The ex vivo phantom experiments with bovine muscle (n = 5) show that within 6 ± 0.2 minutes, the tissue temperature increased by 8 ± 1.37°C. Using rabbits' (n = 5) thigh muscle, the in vivo experiments demonstrated the target temperature reached 44.5°C ± 1.2°C in 8.0 ± 0.5 minutes. The preliminary in vivo experiment with canine prostate hyperthermia achieved 43 ± 2°C in 6.5 ± 0.5 minutes. These results demonstrate that the adaptive controllers with MR thermometry are able to effectively track the target temperature with dynamic tissue properties.

Thermal Sensor Circuit Using Thermography for Temperature-Controlled Laser Hyperthermia

“…Approximately 50% of the temperature values every 100 ms after reaching the tar(T) of 42.5 ∘ C were within the range of 42.5 ± 0.1 ∘ C. The use of other control methods may further suppress the temperature fluctuation. One candidate is the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control method, which is reported to correct the fluctuation of temperature more tightly than the on-off control method [7,18]. The third challenge is to establish a method for the estimation of the temperature inside an irradiated target from the surface temperature, since thermography in principle measures the surface-to-air temperature.…”

Photoacoustic-Based-Close-Loop Temperature Control for Nanoparticle Hyperthermia

“…Since the PID parameters are determined without knowing plant Non-invasive PA temperature measurement demonstrated here provides 0.18 degree monitoring accuracy, high update rate at 10 Hz and a latency of only 0.8 s. Such fast measurement enables the approximately dead-time free plant model and consequently, enables general PID controller that features high proportional gain and small integrator gain to be used for satisfying control without much tuning. Further improvements can be made with advanced PID-based algorithms such as self-tuning regulator [15], which can deliver near-optimum performance without knowing the plant model parameters. Meanwhile, with laser that works at higher repetition rate, the measurement can be accelerated further and by using near infrared wavelength, deep penetration could be attained for in vivo applications.…”

Quick, Single-Frequency Dielectric Characterization of Blood Samples of Pediatric Cancer Patients by a Cylindrical Capacitor: Pilot Study

“…Hence, most of the time, the later (macroscopic) approach is exploited to inspect the net results of the phenomena occurring on microscopic levels. It is important to mention that the electrical properties of blood, besides its main factors, also depend on the external environment conditions like temperature and applied frequency, as well as lighter particles (compared to RBCs and white blood cells (WBCs) and chemical substances) [18][19][20].…”