2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2017.2720801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Neural Network Control of a Flapping Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle With Disturbance Observer

Abstract: The research of this paper works out the attitude and position control of the flapping wing micro aerial vehicle (FWMAV). Neural network control with full state and output feedback are designed to deal with uncertainties in this complex nonlinear FWMAV dynamic system and enhance the system robustness. Meanwhile, we design disturbance observers which are exerted into the FWMAV system via feedforward loops to counteract the bad influence of disturbances. Then, a Lyapunov function is proposed to prove the closed-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its research field includes consensus control [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], flocking control [9], containment control [10], formation control [11][12][13], rendezvous control [14], etc. As one of the most important research topics, formation control, which aims to propel the states or outputs of all agents toward a desired shape, has broad range of practical applications in various areas, such as unmanned aerial vehicles [15][16][17][18], autonomous underwater vehicles [19], mobile robots [20], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its research field includes consensus control [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], flocking control [9], containment control [10], formation control [11][12][13], rendezvous control [14], etc. As one of the most important research topics, formation control, which aims to propel the states or outputs of all agents toward a desired shape, has broad range of practical applications in various areas, such as unmanned aerial vehicles [15][16][17][18], autonomous underwater vehicles [19], mobile robots [20], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tracking control methods have been proposed, such as PID control [1], computed-torque control [2], decentralized control [3], feedback linearization (otherwise known as inverse dynamics control) [4], adaptive control [5], intelligent control (fuzzy control [6], neural-network control [7]), optimal control [8], H ∞ control, [9] iterative learning control [10], model predictive control [11], passive-based control [12], adaptive neural network control [13,14], robust control [15], and sliding-mode control (SMC) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Among the methods, SMC has attracted significant interest due to its computational simplicity for implementation, high robustness to external disturbances, low sensitivity to parameter variations, and fast dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods, SMC has attracted significant interest due to its computational simplicity for implementation, high robustness to external disturbances, low sensitivity to parameter variations, and fast dynamic response. Different from the control compensating uncertainties using the neural network in [13,14], SMC utilizes the switching function to deal with uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of MPSLS is relatively complicated when the coupling among the sinking platform, the suspension rope, the lifting rope, Given that the flexible suspension rope is a distributed parameter system, the model of the MPSLS derived from Hamilton's principles is couple PDEs with infinite dimensions, which make it more difficult to control [5]. The general control methods, such as variable structure sliding-mode control [6], modal control [7], neural network control [8,9], etc. [10,11], can be used to suppress the vibration and improve the lifespan of the system, when the PDEs are discretized into ODEs by using Galerkin approximation method or finite element method [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%