2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-013-0293-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive-Multilevel BDDC and its parallel implementation

Abstract: We combine the adaptive and multilevel approaches to the BDDC and formulate a method which allows an adaptive selection of constraints on each decomposition level. We also present a strategy for the solution of local eigenvalue problems in the adaptive algorithm using the LOBPCG method with a preconditioner based on standard components of the BDDC. The effectiveness of the method is illustrated on several engineering problems. It appears that the Adaptive-Multilevel BDDC algorithm is able to effectively detect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For domain decomposition methods with continuous pressures, see [29,58,59] and the references therein. We note that our two-level results are equally valid for the FE tearing and interconnecting dual-primal (FETI-DP) method [17], due to the well-known duality between BDDC and FETI-DP [34].After the pioneering work [35], recent research on BDDC methods has focused on controlling the condition number of the preconditioned operators through the adaptive generation of coarse spaces [6,8,23,24,25,37,44,48,64]; these techniques lead to robust preconditioning techniques with tunable rates of convergence; see, in particular, [45]. The adaptive enrichment of the primal space is accomplished by means of solving…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For domain decomposition methods with continuous pressures, see [29,58,59] and the references therein. We note that our two-level results are equally valid for the FE tearing and interconnecting dual-primal (FETI-DP) method [17], due to the well-known duality between BDDC and FETI-DP [34].After the pioneering work [35], recent research on BDDC methods has focused on controlling the condition number of the preconditioned operators through the adaptive generation of coarse spaces [6,8,23,24,25,37,44,48,64]; these techniques lead to robust preconditioning techniques with tunable rates of convergence; see, in particular, [45]. The adaptive enrichment of the primal space is accomplished by means of solving…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Most previous work on domain decomposition methods for saddle point problems is based on the benign subspace approach [15,38,39,40,42], where the original saddle point is reduced to a positive definite problem in the case of discontinuous pressure discretization spaces. Multilevel extensions of these ideas have been presented in [48,47,57]. For domain decomposition methods with continuous pressures, see [29,58,59] and the references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the proper choice of the scaling operator ensures robustness of the BDDC methods with respect to jumps in the PDE coefficients aligned with the interface, the convergence rate of the associated preconditioned Krylov methods usually deteriorates when such jumps are not aligned with the interface. After the pioneering work [63], in recent years different approaches have been proposed to accommodate arbitrary jumps in the coefficients of elliptic PDEs within BDDC methods [15,19,41,42,44,45,46,69,75].…”
Section: S287mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach proposed in [75] selects face constraints by iteratively solving sparse eigenproblems defined on each pair of subdomains sharing a face and its boundary. Edge primal constraints, which could be obtained as a by-product of the eigensolver, were not considered in the numerical experiments due to a loss of sparsity of the projected operators involved.…”
Section: S287mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation