Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3511808.3557230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Multi-Source Causal Inference from Observational Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HTCE [20] aids in estimating causal effects in the target domain with assistance from source domain data, but it is limited to specific source and target domains. FedCI [21] and Causal-RFF [22] primarily focus on scenarios where different parties have the same data feature dimensions. In summary, research on cross-silo causal inference accounting for heterogeneous feature dimensions remains unexplored as of now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTCE [20] aids in estimating causal effects in the target domain with assistance from source domain data, but it is limited to specific source and target domains. FedCI [21] and Causal-RFF [22] primarily focus on scenarios where different parties have the same data feature dimensions. In summary, research on cross-silo causal inference accounting for heterogeneous feature dimensions remains unexplored as of now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is most closely related to the recent studies of privacy‐preserving methods for causal inference by Vo et al 27 and Han et al 28,29 †† Vo et al 27 estimate treatment effects by modeling potential outcomes by Gaussian processes. Han et al 28,29 propose to estimate treatment effects for target populations by adaptively and optimally weighing source populations, accounting for the risk of negative transfer when source and target populations are heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…federated estimation [50] (not included in the scoping review final selection since the paper was not published when the scoping review search was launched)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%