1987
DOI: 10.1002/nag.1610110103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive methods to solve free boundary problems of flow through porous media

Abstract: Grid adaptive methods combined with domain adaptation are discussed for two-dimensional seepage flow problems with free boundaries through porous media. Examples of grid and domain adaptive methods are presented to demonstrate several ways to predict grids and shapes of free boundaries using an iterative scheme. Finally, the combined adaptive methods are applied to obtain smooth non-oscillatory shape of a free boundary of seepage flow through non-homogeneous porous media. (1) 1 K e , , = K + -( l -~n ) & where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the impact of the initial guess on the computational cost, Figure 7 plots the residual's behaviour in terms of iteration number. Using the correction factor defined in Equation (23), the convergence of solution is guaranteed for all different guesses. Indeed, there are minor differences between their behaviours.…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To illustrate the impact of the initial guess on the computational cost, Figure 7 plots the residual's behaviour in terms of iteration number. Using the correction factor defined in Equation (23), the convergence of solution is guaranteed for all different guesses. Indeed, there are minor differences between their behaviours.…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Holm and Langtangen [21] take a similar strategy; however, they only focus on one node close to the phreatic surface to achieve the same accuracy benefiting from less computational trouble. The alternative approach is to choose moving grid [23], which has numerous superiorities comparing with the first approach. In this case, the solution domain is firstly guessed and a suitable mesh is filled in.…”
Section: Domain Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several applications to flow problems are presented in [30,31]. Applications to free boundary problems of seepage flow and to shape-optimization problems are presented in [39] and [22] respectively. Extension to nonlinear problems, especially to metal-forming analysis can be found in [38,40] together with a remeshing method.…”
Section: Element Refinement (H-) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical example shows that, similar to linear problems, considerable improvement of the accuracy is obtained by an adaptive mesh refinement and that the influence of singularities on the order of convergence disappears. Chung and Kikuchi (1987) discuss grid adaptive methods combined with domain adaptation for two-dimensional seepage flow problems with free boundaries through porous media. They present examples of grid and domain adaptive methods to demonstrate several ways to predict grids and shapes of free boundaries using an iterative scheme.…”
Section: Residual Flow Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%