1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00137853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed domain methods for free and moving boundary flows in porous media

Abstract: A survey is presented concerning fixed domain methods used to solve mathematical models of free and moving boundary flow problems in porous media. These include the following: variational inequality or'quasi-variational inequality formulations; general inequality formulations which have been set and solved in fixed domains; and the residual flow procedure. Finally, some parallel computing methods and mesh adaptation methods are discussed to demonstrate how these fixed domain formulations can be solved with cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to the fixed mesh numerical approach is a deforming mesh approach where the grid location associated with the water table is unknown and the mesh is adjusted in an iterative manner (Neuman & Witherspoon, 1970, 1971). An early review and discussion on deforming or free surface methods is presented by Bruch (1991). Purkey et al (2004) and Purkey et al (2006) expand the work of Witherspoon (1970, 1971) on deforming finite elements to simulate a shallow water table model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the fixed mesh numerical approach is a deforming mesh approach where the grid location associated with the water table is unknown and the mesh is adjusted in an iterative manner (Neuman & Witherspoon, 1970, 1971). An early review and discussion on deforming or free surface methods is presented by Bruch (1991). Purkey et al (2004) and Purkey et al (2006) expand the work of Witherspoon (1970, 1971) on deforming finite elements to simulate a shallow water table model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%