2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9020148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Mean Shift-Based Identification of Individual Trees Using Airborne LiDAR Data

Abstract: Abstract:Identifying individual trees and delineating their canopy structures from the forest point cloud data acquired by an airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) has significant implications in forestry inventory. Once accurately identified, tree structural attributes such as tree height, crown diameter, canopy based height and diameter at breast height can be derived. This paper focuses on a novel computationally efficient method to adaptively calibrate the kernel bandwidth of a computational scheme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six dissimilar test sites were selected, which were located in the Slovenian Alps, and the LiDAR point density ranged from 26 to 97 pts/m 2 for the different sites. Hu et al [45] developed a tree clustering algorithm based on the mean shift theory. The algorithm was applied to LiDAR data, with an average point density of 15 pts/m 2 acquired over a multi-layered, evergreen broad-leaved forest in South China.…”
Section: Lidar-based Tree Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Six dissimilar test sites were selected, which were located in the Slovenian Alps, and the LiDAR point density ranged from 26 to 97 pts/m 2 for the different sites. Hu et al [45] developed a tree clustering algorithm based on the mean shift theory. The algorithm was applied to LiDAR data, with an average point density of 15 pts/m 2 acquired over a multi-layered, evergreen broad-leaved forest in South China.…”
Section: Lidar-based Tree Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al [43] LiDAR 10 pls/m 2 USA Pennsylvania/deciduous species (leaf-off) tp = 84% Mongus and Zalik [44] LiDAR 26-97 pls/m 2 Slovenia, Alps/mixed conifer forest av. precision = 0.75 Hu et al [45] LiDAR 15 pt/m 2 Southern China/multi-layered evergreen broad-leaved forest av. precision = 0.92…”
Section: Lidar-based Individual Tree Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of adaptive mean shift for individual tree identification was further proved by Hu et al [43]. Instead of using an allometric function, the points were roughly segmented by a fixed bandwidth mean shift first, and the crown sizes were estimated by an iterative region growing at multiple layers of different heights.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-adaptive method calibrating the kernel bandwidth as a function of a local tree allometric model that can adapt to the local forest structure was developed by Ferraz et al in [25]. Our previous study proposed an adaptive mean shift-based clustering approach to segment the 3D forest point clouds and identify individual tree crowns, where much effort was put into the adaptive bandwidth settings: the kernel sizes are automatically changed according to the estimated crown diameters of distinct trees [26]. This approach has been tested over a multi-layered coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest located in South China: the overall tree detection rate reaches 86% (92% of the detected trees are correct), and a specific detection rate of 48% was observed for the suppressed trees (the "precision" is 67%) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study proposed an adaptive mean shift-based clustering approach to segment the 3D forest point clouds and identify individual tree crowns, where much effort was put into the adaptive bandwidth settings: the kernel sizes are automatically changed according to the estimated crown diameters of distinct trees [26]. This approach has been tested over a multi-layered coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest located in South China: the overall tree detection rate reaches 86% (92% of the detected trees are correct), and a specific detection rate of 48% was observed for the suppressed trees (the "precision" is 67%) [26]. It should be emphasized that nearly 30% more suppressed trees can be identified by this adaptive approach than the one using a fixed kernel bandwidth [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%