2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive inverse dynamics control of robots with uncertain kinematics and dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This function is the source of a joint desired position collections for the manipulators movement across the time. Then, using different control techniques: like the PD control with gravity compensation, IDC (Inverse Dynamic Control) or adaptive control, is possible accomplish a manipulator movement on the defined path with the minimal deviation (Marguitu, 2009, Spong, 1992, Wang, 2009). …”
Section: Differential Flatnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function is the source of a joint desired position collections for the manipulators movement across the time. Then, using different control techniques: like the PD control with gravity compensation, IDC (Inverse Dynamic Control) or adaptive control, is possible accomplish a manipulator movement on the defined path with the minimal deviation (Marguitu, 2009, Spong, 1992, Wang, 2009). …”
Section: Differential Flatnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since and are not updated online, the invertibility of and is not a concern. More details about this can be found in [11], [13].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive inverse dynamics control of the position of a robot under dynamic uncertainties was investigated in [11]- [13]. However, the results in [11]- [13] have only been applied to motion control of a single robot in free motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the researches focus on single robot manipulator. In [25], a distributed task-space controller is designed considering dynamic and kinematic uncertainties, but the desired trajectory is constant. When the desired trajectory is time-varying, controllers are designed in [26] and [27], the tracking errors are proved to asymptotically converge to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%