2014
DOI: 10.1260/0263-0923.33.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Integration Method Based on Sub-Division Technique for Nearly Singular Integrals in Near-Field Acoustics Boundary Element Analysis

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present an efficient adaptive integration technique to perform near-field acoustics boundary element analysis, in which nearly singular integrals will be encountered as the source point in integral equation close to the boundary of acoustic domain. At this time the integrand varies sharply, so the conventional Gaussian quadrature becomes inefficient or even inaccurate. In this paper, an adaptive integration technique is proposed, which determines the required Gauss orders and the nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, b is the smallest dimension chosen out of length l and width b of the rectangular structure. At the cutoff squeeze number, r cutoff , damping and spring forces become equal, if only one term is taken in the summation of equations (32) and (33), then the cutoff squeeze number is approximated by…”
Section: -ðà1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, b is the smallest dimension chosen out of length l and width b of the rectangular structure. At the cutoff squeeze number, r cutoff , damping and spring forces become equal, if only one term is taken in the summation of equations (32) and (33), then the cutoff squeeze number is approximated by…”
Section: -ðà1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the output of interest from the analysis is the damping force on the movable shuttle, and the boundary element method (BEM) is more accurate since the traction field exerted by fluid in the MEMS surface is a direct unknown of the numerical formulation. Qu et al 33 studied an efficient adaptive integration technique to perform near-field acoustics boundary element analysis. Unfortunately, standard BEM techniques 34,35 are ill conditioned and fail when applied to complex structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter is known as the hybrid method, which solves the flow field and acoustic field with different methods. Usually, traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods including DNS, LES/DES (detached eddy simulation), and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation methods are utilized to solve flow field and obtain sound sources while boundary element method (BEM), [11][12][13][14] acoustic analogy method 15 , and the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation are employed for the acoustic generation and propagation. In comparison with direct simulation, the hybrid method is preferred to simulate aerodynamic noise of high-speed train due to relatively low requirements of computational configuration and resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In addition, relatively small dimensions limit the accuracy of these methods for low-frequency sound transmission calculation. Another common and effective simulation method that is widely used is the numerical simulation method, which includes the boundary element method (BEM), 2124 finite element method, 2528 and finite difference method. 29,30 In this method, reflection and diffraction are not considered separately but appear as an integral part of the solution of the wave equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%